Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Suitcase causes bomb scare at Akron bus terminal
Akron City Council OKs higher speed on I-77
Chapel Hill isn't rolling right along
Motorcyclist killed, wife injured in Stark County crash
New eateries expand menu of options
Man says he was punched, robbed by 3 people in parking lot
Patrick McManamon: Here's what the Browns should try the rest of the season
Louisville athlete commits to play for Boston College
Family found dead in Ohio home
Blogs:
Pets:
It Takes All Kinds
The Heldenfiles:
Tuesday Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
An interesting thought from a reader
Akron Zips:
Akron vs. Mount Union — Liveblog
Tribe Matters:
Indians announce spring dates
Cleveland Browns:
Mangini doesn't name a quarterback
Kent State Sports:
Flashes interested in another Cincinnati player
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Shaq: It’s All About Winning Championships
Buckeye Blogging:
Buckeyes Roll 100-60 / Season Outlook
Varsity Letters:
Report: Walsh baseball player commits
All Da King's Men:
More On The Fort Hood Jihadist
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Simply Incapable of Telling The Truth
Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (63) Commonwealth Fund Report on Primary Care
See Jane Style:
Muffle Your Muffler
Car Chase:
Clock Tender- Extending the Life of Collector Car Clocks
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Rumors: Akron Starbucks Closing
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jack is looking for a trip to Southern Ohio the week of November 16.
Sound Check:
Aeromsith looking for new singer as Steven Tyler contemplates solo career
HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why People Do Not Live in Northeast Ohio
Akron Gamer:
Video: 'Modern Warfare 2' hits the streets
Move could increase price of water, sewer for consumers, it says
By Bob Downing
Beacon Journal staff writer
Published on Friday, Feb 08, 2008
One national wastewater organization Thursday voiced concern about Akron's proposal to sell off its sewage system.
The National Association of Clean Water Agencies in Washington, D.C., is firmly opposed to privatizing public utilities, said Susan Bruninga, director of public and legislative affairs.
''We feel that utilities are a public trust that should remain in public hands,'' she said, adding that Akron is among its 300 members
The fear is that the prices paid by consumers for water or sewer will soar because private companies must make enough money to operate the utility plus satisfy their shareholders, Bruninga said.
Privatizing a utility is likely to result in higher rates, and the ownership could be sold to other companies in the future, said Ruth Caplan, chair of a national Sierra Club task force on privatizing public utilities. ''It usually doesn't work out the way cities think it will,'' she said.
The problem is that private companies cut back on staff and maintenance in order to generate the requisite profits and utility customers suffer, she said.
Raising such rates, if privately owned, would require approval of the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, agency spokeswoman Shana Eiselstein said.
What Akron is doing is similar to the sale in 2006 of the Chicago Skyway — a 7.8-mile Illinois toll road — to Spanish and Australian consortiums, Akron Service Director Richard Merolla said.
An example closer to home is the city of Barberton selling its hospital, he said. ''It's just a case of selling a city asset,'' he said.
The biggest example of a privatized utility that failed is in Atlanta, where after four years of private operations, the city last month terminated an agreement with United Water, a subsidiary of the French firm Suez, to provide drinking water, Bruninga said.
Direct sales of utilities in larger cities are not that common, but there is a growing number of public-private partnerships in which cities like Milwaukee and Indianapolis own the utilities and contract with private companies to operate them, she said.
Small drinking-water systems are more likely to be sold and purchased than sewer systems, she said.
Officials of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency said they were unaware of any purchase-sale of a large sewer system as proposed by Akron, spokesman Mike Settles said.
A sewer plant and its large sewer lines in Warren County in southwest Ohio were sold to a private company, but the smaller sewer lines remained under municipal ownership, he said.
A sewage system in Clermont County is operated by a private company under a contract, but remains in public ownership, he said.
Finding a buyer for Akron's sewer system may not be easy, said Linda Eichmiller, executive director of the Association of State and Interstate Water Pollution Control Administrators in Washington.
Anyone buying a sewage system also buys into problems like Akron's combined sewer problems with a price tag of $385 million and myriad federal operating and enforcement rules, she said.
''There's just a lot of risk involved and a lot of enforcement issues for potential buyers,'' she said. ''It surprises me.''
Merolla said the city's liability for combined sewers would factor into the final sale price for the sewer system.
There are at least three large players that could be interested: two French companies — Veolia Environment and Suez — and the RWE Group of Germany, Caplan said.
Merolla said the city is just looking into the potential sale and has no buyers lined up.
''We're just beginning. We've got a lot of work ahead of us,'' he said.
Bob Downing can be reached at 330-996-3745 or bdowning@thebeaconjournal.com.
One national wastewater organization Thursday voiced concern about Akron's proposal to sell off its sewage system.
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
