Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Pets:
Cat-loving chihuahua suckles seven abandoned kittens

The Heldenfiles:
Sunday Notebook

Patrick McManamon:
Browns sick after sick loss in Detroit

Akron Zips:
No. 1 Akron to play Stanford next

Tribe Matters:
Seven players added to Tribe’s 40-man roster

Cleveland Browns:
Post-game defensive quotes

Kent State Sports:
Kent State defeats Rochester College, 63-44

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs vs. Philadelphia 76ers

Buckeye Blogging:
OSU – Michigan college football rivals meet in Baghdad

Varsity Letters:
Four area football teams play tonight

All Da King's Men:
The Onion, By Any Other Name…

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Will Health Care Reform Pass?

Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (70) Savings in Medicare Advantage

See Jane Style:
Vintage Chic

Car Chase:
TIME TO GET YOUR COLLECTOR CARS WINTERIZED

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Faye Dunaway to be Evicted?

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Monique asks how to get tickets for the Polar Express.

Sound Check:
Steely Dan Plays "The Royal Scam" at E.J. Thomas Hall

HRLite House:
Personal Rant – You are All Wrong About Jobs, or the Lack of Jobs, Being the Reason People Do Not Live in NEO

Akron Gamer:
Nintendo's Mario endures even as games come and go

Ohio judge wins ruling on poster in courtroom


Associated Press
MANSFIELD: An Ohio judge who has fought since 2001 to hang the Ten Commandments in his courtroom did not violate a court order when he recently displayed a poster that included shorthand versions of the commandments, a federal judge has ruled.

A judge in 2002 ordered Richland County Common Pleas Judge James DeWeese not to display the commandments because doing so violated the Constitution. The decision was upheld by a federal appeals court.

The American Civil Liberties Union, which brought the first case, recently filed another suit, saying DeWeese should be found in contempt because he had posted a version of the Ten Commandments.

DeWeese argued that his current display is ''an editorial statement'' that contrasts the commandments with moral relativist views, something he said was not addressed in the previous case. The display illustrates a debate about philosophies that affect the handling of criminal cases, he said.

U.S. District Judge Kathleen O'Malley agreed, finding that the display significantly differed from what hung on DeWeese's wall in 2002.

The Ohio ACLU is reviewing the decision and hasn't decided on its next move, legal director Jeffrey Gamso said on Friday.


Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
















Most Commented Stories