Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Pets:
It Takes All Kinds

The Heldenfiles:
Tuesday Notebook

Patrick McManamon:
An interesting thought from a reader

Akron Zips:
Akron vs. Mount Union — Liveblog

Tribe Matters:
Indians announce spring dates

Cleveland Browns:
Mangini doesn't name a quarterback

Kent State Sports:
Flashes interested in another Cincinnati player

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Shaq: It’s All About Winning Championships

Buckeye Blogging:
Buckeyes Roll 100-60 / Season Outlook

Varsity Letters:
Report: Walsh baseball player commits

All Da King's Men:
More On The Fort Hood Jihadist

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Simply Incapable of Telling The Truth

Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (63) Commonwealth Fund Report on Primary Care

See Jane Style:
Muffle Your Muffler

Car Chase:
Clock Tender- Extending the Life of Collector Car Clocks

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Rumors: Akron Starbucks Closing

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jack is looking for a trip to Southern Ohio the week of November 16.

Sound Check:
Aeromsith looking for new singer as Steven Tyler contemplates solo career

HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why People Do Not Live in Northeast Ohio

Akron Gamer:
Video: 'Modern Warfare 2' hits the streets

ELECTION 2008
Portage to make 5th try for levy for parks

Money would enable operating five areas now closed to public

By Bob Downing
Beacon Journal staff writer

For the fifth time, the Portage Park District is asking voters to approve a levy for operations.

''The need is tremendous,'' said Christine Craycroft, executive director of the money-strapped system.

The district has five parks that it cannot afford to operate, she said, and they remain closed because of the lack of funds.

On the Nov. 4 ballot is a 0.5-mill levy that would raise $1.7 million a year for 10 years.

The money would be used to operate and maintain Portage parks and trails and to conserve forests, wetlands and other natural areas to improve water quality and wildlife habitat.

Plans call for spending 50 percent of the funds to preserve natural areas and historic sites, 25 percent for operations-maintenance and education, 15 percent for new bike-and-hike trails and other park facilities and 10 percent for partnership projects with Portage County municipalities.

Similar levy requests were rejected by voters in 1996, 1997, 2000 and 2001.

The levy would cost the owner of a $100,000 house $16 a year.

Craycroft said the park system has survived on grants and donations of about $175,000 a year, most of which come from the Portage County commissioners and the state.

That's just not enough money to operate, sustain, develop or expand the park system, Craycroft said.

''There is a pent-up demand for parks across Portage County, and there are lots of conservation projects that could be funded'' if the levy is approved, she said.

The levy also would enable Portage County to seek federal and state grants that require local matches. The park district has been unable to seek such funds because it cannot provide that local share, she said.

The park district operates Towner's Woods in Franklin Township, Dix Park in Ravenna Township, the eight-mile Headwaters Trail between Mantua and Garrettsville, the Portage Hike and Bike Trail between Kent and Ravenna and Seneca Ponds Park in Streetsboro.


Bob Downing can be reached at 330-996-3745 or bdowning@thebeaconjournal.com.

For the fifth time, the Portage Park District is asking voters to approve a levy for operations.

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button


Glock20

Posted 09:05 AM, 09/23/2008

The country is in financial crisis. These parks do not need to be opened. They are not necessary. If there is such a "demand" for them, then let the people who demand them, pay an admission fee.


May Fong
akron, oh

Posted 11:04 AM, 09/23/2008

I agree. At least Dont try to EXPAND anything. I doubt there is that much Demand. That the tax payers would be willing to pay for expansion. I would cut it down and cut out NEW bike and hike trails etc. Then maybe it will pass.
















Most Commented Stories