Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Chapel Hill isn't rolling right along
Akron City Council OKs higher speed on I-77
Suitcase causes bomb scare at Akron bus terminal
New eateries expand menu of options
Patrick McManamon: Here's what the Browns should try the rest of the season
Man says he was punched, robbed by 3 people in parking lot
Motorcyclist killed, wife injured in Stark County crash
Stark County engineer dies at 49
Blogs:
Pets:
First Person: Inside St. Louis Pit Bull Shelter
The Heldenfiles:
Tuesday Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
An interesting thought from a reader
Akron Zips:
Akron vs. Mount Union — Liveblog
Tribe Matters:
Indians announce spring dates
Cleveland Browns:
Mangini doesn't name a quarterback
Kent State Sports:
Flashes interested in another Cincinnati player
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Cavs: Yeah, on That Issue of Privacy
Buckeye Blogging:
Buckeyes Roll 100-60 / Season Outlook
Varsity Letters:
Twinsburg likes chances, but warns offense needs to deliver
All Da King's Men:
More On The Fort Hood Jihadist
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Simply Incapable of Telling The Truth
Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (63) Commonwealth Fund Report on Primary Care
See Jane Style:
Muffle Your Muffler
Car Chase:
Clock Tender- Extending the Life of Collector Car Clocks
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Rumors: Akron Starbucks Closing
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Kimberly requests information on living in Columbus, Ohio.
Sound Check:
Aeromsith looking for new singer as Steven Tyler contemplates solo career
HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why People Do Not Live in Northeast Ohio
Akron Gamer:
Video: 'Modern Warfare 2' hits the streets
U.S. senator criticizes technology developed by Lockheed in Akron
By Rick Armon
and Jim Mackinnon
Beacon Journal staff writers
Published on Monday, Dec 22, 2008
The high-altitude airship being built in Akron for the U.S. Department of Defense is a waste of money and isn't even wanted by the Pentagon, a U.S. senator says.
Sen. Tom Coburn, a Republican from Oklahoma and frequent critic of pork-barrel spending, features the airship in his new report, 2008: Worst Waste of the Year.
In the 49-page report, he highlights $1.3 billion in questionable spending nationwide. The airship, being built by Lockheed Martin at the Akron Airdock, receives special treatment as an example of egregious spending.
''For years, Congress has poured millions of dollars into the development of the [airship] despite repeated insistence from the Pentagon that the technology is not needed,'' the report says.
Lockheed Martin, a defense contractor, received $149.2 million a few years ago for the project and another $3.2 million this year.
The unmanned airship is designed to float as high as 60,000 feet for as long as six months in one spot and be used for military reconnaissance
and communication. It is intended to be a low-cost alternative to satellites.
''I'm not against sending money to cities that are economically depressed for something the government is going to use, but I'm against them producing something that the government doesn't need,'' Coburn said in a telephone interview from his home in Oklahoma.
It also might have been wiser to bid the project competitively instead of just giving the money to Lockheed Martin, he said.
He also said the airship is ''compromising the defense of the entire nation,'' because the money could be better spent on other military projects.
Comment from the Department of Defense was not available.
Lockheed Martin issued a statement defending its work.
''Lockheed Martin is committed to supporting our war fighters with this much-needed persistent capability,'' the company said.
Lockheed Martin said the first phase of the project involves building the High Altitude Long Endurance Demonstrator, also known as HALE-D.
The prototype airship is scheduled for its first flight test in the summer.
The initial airship is being built ''to demonstrate the feasibility of controlled high altitude lighter-than-air flight while carrying a payload for a duration of two weeks,'' the company said.
The airship is being designed to carry payloads for different missions at less cost than competing airborne systems, Lockheed Martin said.
In his report, Coburn takes a jab at U.S. Rep. Tim Ryan, D-Niles, for pushing the project as a way to provide jobs in his district.
''I see financial ruin for us in our country if we have leaders who aren't thinking beyond their own parochial interests,'' Coburn said. ''In light of what's happening in our country . . . shouldn't we be more fiscally proper in how we spend your money and your kids' money?''
Congressional members need to determine spending priorities based on national interests and not focus so much on earmarks, especially because the national debt stands at $10.6 trillion, he said.
''But Congress doesn't do that. That's why we're in trouble,'' Coburn said.
Ryan issued a three-sentence statement defending his support for the airship and disputing Coburn's suggestion that the military doesn't want it.
''I believe that the high altitude airship is an important project, not just for my district, but for the U.S. military,'' Ryan said. ''The project was originally requested by the administration, and the airship is still supported by both the Department of the Army and the Department of the Air Force. It is and remains an important defense project that provides needed jobs for my district.''
The airship project also was cited in the 2008 Congressional Pig Book, a publication by the Citizens Against Government Waste that identifies pork-barrel spending. The watchdog group noted that $787,200 was given to the project for fuel cells.
In addition to the airship, Coburn cites:
• $15,000 for Summit County to create a voice-mail program for the homeless.
• $188,000 for the Lobster Institute, which is developing an underwater ''LobsterCam.''
• $784,000 for Kansas City, Kan., Community College for training for casino workers.
• $24.6 million for the National Park Service's 100th year anniversary, which doesn't take place until 2016.
• $298,068 for potato farmers to advertise specialty potatoes to high-end restaurants.
To read the report, go to http://coburn.senate.gov/public/.
Rick Armon can be reached at 330-996-3569 or rarmon@thebeaconjournal.com.
Jim Mackinnon can be reached at 330-996-3544 or jmackinnon@thebeaconjournal.com.
The high-altitude airship being built in Akron for the U.S. Department of Defense is a waste of money and isn't even wanted by the Pentagon, a U.S. senator says.
Get the full article here.
nothing will change as long as the politicians don't listen...and we all know they don't listen!
Now we can see iff'n our president elect can cut these wasteful programs, or let them continue to waste taxpayers money.
Don't hold your breath waiting for anything to change. If anything, they will get worse under king obama.
Our president-elect has already backed off of two of his big promises (balanced budget and universal health care). Now, he says, he's taking on a more pressing problem, the economy. I Guess he didn't know it was in the tank when he was campaigning. He'll be another Kennedy. Lip service to the public, who, by and large, will be too stupit to know that is all they are getting.
www.changeakronnow.com
If he doesn't go after the economy. There will be no need for universal health care or a budget to worry about. For a Very long time. Since the country will be in a depression that would make the last one look like a picnic... .
He probably would not say this if it was located in oklahoma
Brown & Voinovich & Ryan better respond in kind to this jackarse Coburn. There is nothing wrong with a little pork in the Akron Ohio area from Congress. Meanwhile, looking out for his own state, Coburn failed to blast very similar earmarks that benefited Oklahoma like the $25 million for port security in Oklahoma. The last time I looked at a map, Oklahoma has no ports. He's just another political jackarse !!!
I agree with the senator that most of the items listed here are a waste of taxpayer money.
However,his criticism of the airship project ,which could provide 24/7 surveillance , is ill informed .Satellite and aircraft can provide only intermittent and expensive observation of suspected terrorist targets .Having radar track a suspected enemy will be useless if they are coming to our beaches in rubber boats or polyester submarines.Remember the terrorist attacks on India a few weeks ago? If what I saw is accurate,they arrived by rubber boat.I remember reading a few years ago about a North Korean plastic submarine that was used to infiltrate south Korea. If the North Koreans have been working on this for years they probably have a non metallic craft available RIGHT NOW that could slip right past radar, sonar, and magnetic detectors of any country.The capability provided by the air ships might be the only way we even have a chance to stop attacks carried out in this manner.
To say the program is "compromising the defense of the entire nation" is just insane.
Last I checked, there's plenty of area jobs being upheld at Lockheed for a number of causes, the new experimental airship being one of them. Sure, while there are a number of spending items a report like this can bluntly point out, something like this should have been researched just a little better before being added to this report. The airdock is a unique building for something like this, and the jobs alone should speak volumes on top of the fact that this concept could actually be cost effective if it works, for the future.
The airship is an intriguing project that has been tossed around for years.Present day UAV's are limited by fuel, altitude limits and manhours of personnel. By having a weapons platform loiter at 60K feet for days on end, with minimal power and the ability to (possibly) release laser guided munitions, the possibilties are endless.
I agree with the Senator. I know someone who works there and they must be really overpaid because he has a new Jeep, 3 motorcycles and drinks everyday.Somebody does need to look into their spending.
