Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Blogs:
Akron Docs in Haiti:
Almost home
First Bell - On Education:
Celebrate Pi Day on March 14
Pets:
Humane Society of Greater Akron to move animals to new Twinsburg location
The Heldenfiles:
Sunday Viewing Notebook
Akron Zips:
Liveblog – MAC Championship
Tribe Matters:
Cabrera diagnosed with strained groin
Cleveland Browns:
Quinn traded, Wimbley next?
Balanced Ledger:
How times have changed?
Kent State Sports:
NIT selection show set for 9 p.m. on ESPNU
Cleveland Cavaliers:
LeBron Makes NBA’s Top 10 Plays Twice
Buckeye Blogging:
Bucks High Seed – Turner High Praise
Varsity Letters:
High school hoops playoff thoughts
All Da King's Men:
ObamaWear
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Texas Flood Of Ignorance
Akron Law Café:
Can Corporations Be Shamed?
Car Chase:
2010 CONCOURS SEASON IS UPON US
Let's Talk Real Estate:
The Academy Awards!!!
Sound Check:
Pearl Jam coming to Cleveland in May
See Jane Style:
Who Wore What – The Oscars
HRLite House:
Clean Up Week – Post 1 – IPMA Central Site
Akron Gamer:
'Uncharted 2' nabs 5 trophies at video game awards
Council members retain posts after special election
By Katie Byard
Beacon Journal staff writer
Published on Wednesday, Jan 14, 2009
Voters in Kent overwhelmingly chose to retain five City Council members Tuesday.
Five of the city's nine council members were subjects of a recall effort that some say grew out of a dispute over a tax increase.
''The winners today are the people of Kent and the city of Kent,'' said Jack Amrhein, D-2, one of the five targeted in the recall effort. ''I'm thankful for the vote of confidence.''
In addition to Amrhein, those who retained their seats were Rick Hawksley, D-at-large, on the council since January 2002; Michael DeLeone, D-at-large, on council since January 1998; Heidi Shaffer, D-5, and Tracy Wallach, D-6. Amrhein, Shaffer and Wallach have been on council since last January.
Amrhein, a history teacher at Kent Roosevelt High School, and Shaffer thanked members of the Citizens for a Better Kent group, which campaigned against the recall effort. Members distributed yard signs and went door-to-door, dropping off fliers.
Shaffer said the group's members understood ''while the right to recall is important to retain, this recall was wrong.''
Echoing other opponents of the recall, Shaffer said, the language on the
recall petitions ''was very vague, very ambiguous.''
Shaffer, director of Kent Yoga Center, said, ''There was actually not a campaign from the other side to present their case.''
The petitions filed with the Kent City Council that led to the recall election charge that the members have ''acted on behalf of their own interest and neglected the very basic concerns of the city's infrastructure and financial well-being.''
Beth Ostwich, a former Democratic Ward 6 council member who helped in the petition campaign, has said the recall ''is about giving the citizens a chance to change their government'' and about ''letting the residents of Kent have a voice and going forward.''
She could not be reached for comment Tuesday.
Others have said the recall effort was spurred by the City Council's approval in September of a rollback from 2 percent to 1.5 percent in the tax credit given to anyone who works outside of the city but lives in Kent. The council rescinded the rollback in October.
In Tuesday's special election, the recall effort was soundly defeated, with residents keeping their council members with votes greater than 2-1 or 3-1.
For example, the vote in Ward 2 to retain Amrhein was 399 to 128. In Ward 5, the vote to keep Shaffer was 145 to 51.
Voters citywide were eligible to cast ballots in the recall elections involving the two at-large council members, DeLeone and Hawksley. The vote to keep DeLeone was 1,512 to 401; the vote to retain Hawksley was 1,472 to 446.
Katie Byard can be reached at 330-996-3781 or kbyard@thebeaconjournal.com.
Voters in Kent overwhelmingly chose to retain five City Council members Tuesday.
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
Posted 10:41 AM, 01/14/2009
then the people spoke! I hope the Council members will now remeber they are accountable to the people!
somewhere near you, US
Posted 11:12 AM, 01/14/2009
Too bad there isn't a way to charge the nutjobs of "citizens" for a Better Kent with the cost of the recall.
If you feel so strongly about something, get involved with the election process, vote and accept the consequences. Stop wasting taxpayer money on special interest recall attempts.
Kent, Oh
Posted 09:15 PM, 01/14/2009
Question Authority, I think you're confused. Citizens for a Better Kent is the group that was AGAINST the recall effort. The people who should pay for the recall election are those who started the recall petitions in the first place. Obviously it was a waste of time and money.
