Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Family found dead in Ohio home
Robbers order bar patrons to empty pockets
Man gets 3 years in prison for having sex with horse
Sex-toy study at Duke University raises some eyebrows
Akron man turns himself in after authorities turn up heat
Get ready for detour, delays on Route 8
Man appears alive at own funeral
Blogs:
Pets:
Not 101 Dalmations…but close!
The Heldenfiles:
Friday Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
Saturday entertainment, one more time …
Akron Zips:
No. 1 UA soccer remains perfect, Zips football defeats rival Flashes
Tribe Matters:
Tribe makes roster moves
Cleveland Browns:
Lewis doesn't like boycott
Kent State Sports:
Kent State falls to Akron, 20-28
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs at Knicks
Buckeye Blogging:
Weekly ‘B’ Deck Report – New Mexico St.
Varsity Letters:
Wrestling, bowling teams prepare for season
All Da King's Men:
Bigger And Better Boondoggles
Blog of Mass Destruction:
The Shooter
Akron Law Café:
NEW U.S. Supreme Court Database
See Jane Style:
Muffle Your Muffler
Car Chase:
Perfect Weather for an Autumn Drive
Let's Talk Real Estate:
RUMORS: Downtown Restaurant Explosion
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jack is looking for a trip to Southern Ohio the week of November 16.
Sound Check:
The Black Keys to perform benefit concert at Musica on November 27
HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why People Do Not Live in Northeast Ohio
Akron Gamer:
New 'Call of Duty' could set entertainment record
Adult entertainment owners, trade group fail to get state's 'no-touch' rule declared unconstitutional
By Phil Trexler
Beacon Journal staff writer
Published on Tuesday, Jun 23, 2009
A federal judge has upheld Ohio's ''no-touch'' law for strip clubs in Akron and around the state.
A group of adult entertainment owners and the Buckeye Association of Club Executives, a not-for-profit trade group that represents cabarets and adult bookstores, had sued in U.S. District Court seeking to have the state's no-touch law declared unconstitutional.
Akron was among several cities and counties named as defendants in the lawsuit filed in October 2007. The suit came in reaction to new state laws covering exotic dance clubs and adult bookstores.
Judge Solomon Oliver Jr., in a 45-page decision released Monday, granted motions by local government attorneys to have the suit dismissed.
A message left with Berkman, Gordon, Murray & DeVan, a Cleveland law firm representing the adult entertainment groups, was not returned.
Oliver found that the state law that bans exotic dancers and customers from touching each other does not violate First Amendment or other constitutional rights of the business owners.
The judge also upheld the state law that limits the hours of operation for adult clubs that serve liquor.
Oliver disagreed with claims from club owners that the ''no touch'' law violated freedom of speech guarantees.
He also disagreed with arguments that the ban is overly broad and could be applied to ballet dancers or other mainstream theatrical performers.
''Indeed, there is no evidence before the court that musicals such as Hair are characterized by an emphasis on specified sexual activities or anatomical areas,'' the judge wrote in his decision.
Phil Trexler can be reached at 330-996-3717 or ptrexler@thebeaconjournal.com.
A federal judge has upheld Ohio's ''no-touch'' law for strip clubs in Akron and around the state.
Get the full article here.
Close them all down period
It hasnt stopped them in the past, and it wont stop them from touching in the future. More touching means more money.
that's not goin' to stop them from touching..
please..that's the reason they are goin' there
in the first place..
Personally, I've put many of these gals through college!
The pnly way to get these girls to resist touching you is to marry them.
only way... sorry, bad type
yeah I know what you mean Stleo, I married one. Oh the good ol daze!!!!
yeah I know exactly what you mean Stleo, I married one.
Thank Phil Burress and Citizens for Community Values for this. Next on their real hit list: ban on adoption by un-married couples, outlaw the sale of sex toys, shut down erotic stores, adult book stores. They're also known for hanging around Proctor & Gamble's offices protesting and harassing people after that company started offering benefits to domestic partners of their employers.
Just another group of people making their opinion law...law should be based on logic.
wow, I didn't know that was the law now back in Ohio. Wasn't like that when I was 17 sneaking into XTC back in the good ol days haha..and it certaintly isn't like that out hear in Vegas haha I would never move back to the dump of Ohio!
I never knew Ohio was part of the Bible Belt.
Most of these women are single mothers without support, job skills, or have lost their better job in this economy, trying to support their kids without resorting to 100% real prostitution. Is the idea of this to make sure that they do that instead?
What's the diffrence between selling yourself in the club or on the street? All they are doing is getting to stay warm inside.
Hey, what are blind men suppose to do at strip clubs now? This is discrimination of blind men everywhere!
I think any individual can determine for themselves if they want to be touched or not. I don't need laws making my mind up for me. We allow abortions because a woman has the right because its her body. Well, its my body and I don't have a problem with a hot dancer rubbing her rump on my leg...... So it's illegal to allow a dancer to touch my body but it is legal for a woman to allow a doctor to perform an abortion. Makes no sense!
One good thing about the military is they sent me to see how the southern half lives...
Stripclubs in the south, the bible belt of the world, could just be renamed brothels.
I will always support our local single moms . . . one dollar at a time!
I think it is time for a background check on Phil Burress and all the members of the Citizens for Community Values . . . execute a search that is as thorough as a nearsighted proctologist on a polyp safari!
I bet you'll find someone that was touched inappropriately . . . probably by Phil.
This is just an awful application of state legislature. Why must our state mire itself in nanny tactics, trying to save us from ourselves with strip club and gambling laws, instead of making this area economically viable again? Local and state leaders, if it's not about JOBS then we don't want to hear it.
Actually a lot of these girls are drug addicts and need to make a quick buck in order to buy their next hit.
