Events Calendar
In This Section
Akron City Council OKs higher speed on I-77
Needy may get break from Akron on sewer costs
Royals and Chipps in battle royale
Akron home prices rank best in college-town poll
Retired Green officer finally gets Bronze Star
Indians and Reds to share ballpark
Most Read Stories
Unusual sports bar to be sold at auction
Motorcyclist killed, wife injured in Stark County crash
Family found dead in Ohio home
Man says he was punched, robbed by 3 people in parking lot
Circle K on Brown Street robbed
Man gets 3 years in prison for having sex with horse
Bank helps more save their homes
Woman says clinic refused to help her get pregnant because she's not married
Humane Society telethon short of goal
Letters to the editor - Nov. 9
'Docs Who Rock' delivers excitement
Blogs:
Pets:
Officials: NYer Had 20 Dead Dogs Buried in Yard
The Heldenfiles:
Monday Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
Time for Kokinis, Browns to agree and part ways
Akron Zips:
Zips tip off tomorrow
Tribe Matters:
Indians announce spring dates
Cleveland Browns:
Mangini doesn't name a quarterback
Kent State Sports:
KSU Notes – November 9
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Shaq: It’s All About Winning Championships
Buckeye Blogging:
Weekly ‘B’ Deck Report – New Mexico St.
Varsity Letters:
Walsh Jesuit’s Caponi commits to Duquesne
All Da King's Men:
If It Looks Like Islamic Terrorism…
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Dems Message To Women: Don't Enjoy The Sex
Akron Law Café:
Abortion Analogies
See Jane Style:
Muffle Your Muffler
Car Chase:
Clock Tender- Extending the Life of Collector Car Clocks
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Rumors: Akron Starbucks Closing
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jack is looking for a trip to Southern Ohio the week of November 16.
Sound Check:
The Black Keys to perform benefit concert at Musica on November 27
HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why People Do Not Live in Northeast Ohio
Akron Gamer:
New 'Call of Duty' could set entertainment record
By Terry Kinney
POSTED: 05:16 p.m. EDT, Oct 23, 2007
Associated Press Writer
CINCINNATI -- A federal appeals court today struck down as unconstitutional a law intended to fight child pornography, saying it restricts protected speech with by setting reporting requirements that are overbroad.
Producers of certain sexually explicit photographs are required to maintain extensive records regarding the individuals depicted, according to the Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act of 1988, as amended by Congress.
The problem with the law is ''producers'' can refer to anyone who creates a visual representation of sexually explicit conduct through videotaping, photographing or computer manipulation, said a panel of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The law makes no provision to exempt photographs not intended for a commercial purpose, or those never intended to be transferred.
The ruling is a ''very, very significant victory for freedom of expression,'' said J. Michael Murray, which made the constitutional challenge on behalf of Connection Distributing Co. of Cleveland.
He said it may bar government agents from entering publishing places and demanding to inspect photo records.
''We are disappointed in the court's ruling,'' said Justice Department spokesman Charles Miller. ''The statute was enacted to protect those who are underage from being used as performers in sexually explicit media. We are currently reviewing the ruling and in the process of determining what the government's next step will be in this matter.''
The court said it had to determine whether the statute regulated conduct or speech.
''While the government is indeed aiming at conduct, child abuse, it is regulating protected speech, sexually explicit images of adults, to get at that conduct,'' Judge Cornelia Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion.
Child abuse is already illegal, the court noted.
''Adult sexual conduct is not illegal and it is, in fact, constitutionally protected,'' the court said.
Connection publishes a number of magazines that depict sexual activity among adults, including ones aimed at ''swingers,'' who do not practice sexual monogamy. The magazines show explicit sexual activity in photos taken by couples who want to meet other swinging couples, the court noted.
Murray said the ruling would enable Connection to publish explicit pictures without photo identifications.
''We do not belittle the despicability of child pornography, and we appreciate the difficulties faced by the government,'' the majority opinion said. ''There are a myriad of limitations available, however, that would reduce the breadth of the record keeping requirements and would more narrowly focus on the government's interest and therefore remove some of the protected speech from the statute's coverage.''
The ruling reversed a judgment in favor of the government and sent the case back to U.S. District Court Judge John Manos in Cleveland with instructions to find the statute overly broad and enter a judgment for Connection.
Judge Karen Nelson Moore wrote a separate concurring opinion. Judge David McKeague delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
Associated Press Writer
CINCINNATI -- A federal appeals court today struck down as unconstitutional a law intended to fight child pornography, saying it restricts protected speech with by setting reporting requirements that are overbroad.
Producers of certain sexually explicit photographs are required to maintain extensive records regarding the individuals depicted, according to the Child Protection and Obscenity Enforcement Act of 1988, as amended by Congress.
The problem with the law is ''producers'' can refer to anyone who creates a visual representation of sexually explicit conduct through videotaping, photographing or computer manipulation, said a panel of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The law makes no provision to exempt photographs not intended for a commercial purpose, or those never intended to be transferred.
The ruling is a ''very, very significant victory for freedom of expression,'' said J. Michael Murray, which made the constitutional challenge on behalf of Connection Distributing Co. of Cleveland.
He said it may bar government agents from entering publishing places and demanding to inspect photo records.
''We are disappointed in the court's ruling,'' said Justice Department spokesman Charles Miller. ''The statute was enacted to protect those who are underage from being used as performers in sexually explicit media. We are currently reviewing the ruling and in the process of determining what the government's next step will be in this matter.''
The court said it had to determine whether the statute regulated conduct or speech.
''While the government is indeed aiming at conduct, child abuse, it is regulating protected speech, sexually explicit images of adults, to get at that conduct,'' Judge Cornelia Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion.
Child abuse is already illegal, the court noted.
''Adult sexual conduct is not illegal and it is, in fact, constitutionally protected,'' the court said.
Connection publishes a number of magazines that depict sexual activity among adults, including ones aimed at ''swingers,'' who do not practice sexual monogamy. The magazines show explicit sexual activity in photos taken by couples who want to meet other swinging couples, the court noted.
Murray said the ruling would enable Connection to publish explicit pictures without photo identifications.
''We do not belittle the despicability of child pornography, and we appreciate the difficulties faced by the government,'' the majority opinion said. ''There are a myriad of limitations available, however, that would reduce the breadth of the record keeping requirements and would more narrowly focus on the government's interest and therefore remove some of the protected speech from the statute's coverage.''
The ruling reversed a judgment in favor of the government and sent the case back to U.S. District Court Judge John Manos in Cleveland with instructions to find the statute overly broad and enter a judgment for Connection.
Judge Karen Nelson Moore wrote a separate concurring opinion. Judge David McKeague delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
Most Commented Stories
- 174
- 68
Woman says clinic refused to help her get pregnant because she's not married
53
- 36
- 31
- 28
- 26
- 24
- 21
- 19
- 19
- 18
- 18
- 15
- 14
