Events Calendar
In This Section
Embattled S.C. governor faces 37 state ethics charges
Police: Pennsylvania man killed misbehaving puppy before Steelers game
Feds find association between Chinese drywall, corrosion
Michael Jackson's doctor returns to work at Houston clinic
U.N. says greenhouse gases reach record high in 2008
Strickland to veto casino rule if local control not protected
Akron Children's Hospital CEO, wife announce $1 million gift to support research
Canadian woman loses benefits over Facebook photo
Most Read Stories
Victim of beating in Kent last week is declared dead at Akron hospital
Akron man killed in crash on his street
Can DNA tests free ex-Akron captain?
Browns find another way to lose
2 men shot during party in Fairlawn
After 30 years at the helm of Akron Children's, Considine still looks to future
Akron Circle K store robbed for second time this month
Dad accused of forcing son into field, killing him
Man found dead in North Akron home is identified
Kangaroo tries to drown dog, attacks owner
Rain, driver inexperience cited in fatal Green crash
Browns lose game they never should have lost
Woman's purse snatched after beer purchase
Blogs:
Pets:
Cat-loving chihuahua suckles seven abandoned kittens
The Heldenfiles:
Sunday Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
Browns sick after sick loss in Detroit
Akron Zips:
No. 1 Akron to play Stanford next
Tribe Matters:
Seven players added to Tribe’s 40-man roster
Cleveland Browns:
Post-game defensive quotes
Kent State Sports:
Kent State defeats Rochester College, 63-44
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs vs. Philadelphia 76ers
Buckeye Blogging:
OSU – Michigan college football rivals meet in Baghdad
Varsity Letters:
Four area football teams play tonight
All Da King's Men:
The Onion, By Any Other Name…
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Will Health Care Reform Pass?
Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (70) Savings in Medicare Advantage
See Jane Style:
Vintage Chic
Car Chase:
TIME TO GET YOUR COLLECTOR CARS WINTERIZED
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Faye Dunaway to be Evicted?
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Monique asks how to get tickets for the Polar Express.
Sound Check:
Steely Dan Plays "The Royal Scam" at E.J. Thomas Hall
HRLite House:
Personal Rant – You are All Wrong About Jobs, or the Lack of Jobs, Being the Reason People Do Not Live in NEO
Akron Gamer:
Nintendo's Mario endures even as games come and go
By Dennis J. Willard
Beacon Journal staff writer
POSTED: 07:25 p.m. EDT, Mar 12, 2008
COLUMBUS: Got milk controversy.
Whenever farmers or milk producers state their cartons are ''rbST-free,'' an acronym for Monsanto's artificial growth hormone recombinant bovine somatotropin, the ag-tech giant wants equal time on the label.
Monsanto and the Ohio Farm Bureau have lobbied in Ohio to ensure ''rbST-free'' milk labels also contain a disclaimer in the same size and color typeface stating the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has found no significant difference between milk from cows injected or not injected with the artificial hormone.
Gov. Ted Strickland agreed, issuing an emergency rule on Feb. 7 through the Ohio Department of Agriculture granting Monsanto's and the farm bureau's wish.
Some farmers in Ohio have felt pressured by large distributors like the Kroger Co. to move away from injecting their cows with artificial hormones or risk not being on the shelves in the grocery chain.
Critics, including the International Dairy Foods Association, the Ohio Farmers Union, organic milk producers and environmental groups, maintain the Monsanto rule is burdensome and effectively kills any effort to label milk as rbST-free.
The department has until 5 p.m. today to decide whether to move ahead with plans to make the emergency rule permanent through approval from the Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review (JCARR).
On Wednesday, Lewis R. Jones, the department's dairy division chief, and legal counsel David Gorman, listened to 27 witnesses testify for more than four hours, a majority of whom oppose Strickland's disclaimer rule.
The hearing would have been longer, but Jones and Gorman asked no questions and anyone who wanted to add more to their testimony had until the end of the day to put their rebuttals in writing.
After, Jones said leaders in the department, including the director, Robert Boggs, would meet, review the testimony and decide whether to rescind the order, recommend changes or submit the rule to JCARR as originally written.
For more than 14 years, since the FDA approved the use of rbST, more and more farmers and milk producers have labeled their product as hormone free, especially in recent years, as organic goods have become more popular and profitable.
Lawyers and scientists lined up Wednesday arguing over whether Monsanto's hormone has been banned in Canada and a large part of the European Union, if Strickland's rule violates Interstate Commerce rights, the FDA's credibility and the warnings on rbST's packaging.
They also debated the definition of free speech with each side having a different take on what is needed to fully inform the public.
Critics of the rule argue what is known as ''absence labeling'' has worked great for more than a decade. When a producer states something is rbST-free, they are absence labeling.
Monsanto believes absence labeling sends a message that the hormone is inherently bad, and points out that the FDA approved rbST.
Stacey Slater, Monsanto's assistant general counsel, told Lewis and Gorman that the governor's rule ensures the FDA's findings are fully disclosed.
She said producers do not have to label their milk, but if they insist they are hormone free then they must explain the ''whole truth'' to consumers.
Jerry Slominski, senior vice-president for the dairy foods association, said the rule should be rescinded because consumers want more choices in the dairy case, not fewer.
Slominski said the administration was engaging in a debate that will ultimately lead to a loss of consumer confidence and trust in dairy products.
Brendon Cull, representing Kroger, said his company pays a premium for milk that is rbST-free because it became clear from feedback that customers are demanding it.
''We believe strongly that our milk, which is no longer from cows treated with rbST, should be labeled as such,'' Cull said.
Rob Bouick, an Ohio dairy farmer, applauded Strickland and the department for having the courage to stand up to Kroger, the dairy foods association and other ''anti-technology activists'' that he said were using demagoguery to exploit the labeling issue.
Bouick said the milk marketers forced him to stop using rbST or face not having his milk on grocery shelves, and his production fell 20 percent.
''IDFA claims they speak for farmers. They don't speak for me,'' Bouick said.
James Armstrong, a consumer from Columbus, said he grew up on a family farm in Nebraska and is careful to read labels to avoid artificial ingredients.
''I just want the plain simple truth,'' Armstrong said.
COLUMBUS: Got milk controversy.
Whenever farmers or milk producers state their cartons are ''rbST-free,'' an acronym for Monsanto's artificial growth hormone recombinant bovine somatotropin, the ag-tech giant wants equal time on the label.
Monsanto and the Ohio Farm Bureau have lobbied in Ohio to ensure ''rbST-free'' milk labels also contain a disclaimer in the same size and color typeface stating the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has found no significant difference between milk from cows injected or not injected with the artificial hormone.
Gov. Ted Strickland agreed, issuing an emergency rule on Feb. 7 through the Ohio Department of Agriculture granting Monsanto's and the farm bureau's wish.
Some farmers in Ohio have felt pressured by large distributors like the Kroger Co. to move away from injecting their cows with artificial hormones or risk not being on the shelves in the grocery chain.
Critics, including the International Dairy Foods Association, the Ohio Farmers Union, organic milk producers and environmental groups, maintain the Monsanto rule is burdensome and effectively kills any effort to label milk as rbST-free.
The department has until 5 p.m. today to decide whether to move ahead with plans to make the emergency rule permanent through approval from the Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review (JCARR).
On Wednesday, Lewis R. Jones, the department's dairy division chief, and legal counsel David Gorman, listened to 27 witnesses testify for more than four hours, a majority of whom oppose Strickland's disclaimer rule.
The hearing would have been longer, but Jones and Gorman asked no questions and anyone who wanted to add more to their testimony had until the end of the day to put their rebuttals in writing.
After, Jones said leaders in the department, including the director, Robert Boggs, would meet, review the testimony and decide whether to rescind the order, recommend changes or submit the rule to JCARR as originally written.
For more than 14 years, since the FDA approved the use of rbST, more and more farmers and milk producers have labeled their product as hormone free, especially in recent years, as organic goods have become more popular and profitable.
Lawyers and scientists lined up Wednesday arguing over whether Monsanto's hormone has been banned in Canada and a large part of the European Union, if Strickland's rule violates Interstate Commerce rights, the FDA's credibility and the warnings on rbST's packaging.
They also debated the definition of free speech with each side having a different take on what is needed to fully inform the public.
Critics of the rule argue what is known as ''absence labeling'' has worked great for more than a decade. When a producer states something is rbST-free, they are absence labeling.
Monsanto believes absence labeling sends a message that the hormone is inherently bad, and points out that the FDA approved rbST.
Stacey Slater, Monsanto's assistant general counsel, told Lewis and Gorman that the governor's rule ensures the FDA's findings are fully disclosed.
She said producers do not have to label their milk, but if they insist they are hormone free then they must explain the ''whole truth'' to consumers.
Jerry Slominski, senior vice-president for the dairy foods association, said the rule should be rescinded because consumers want more choices in the dairy case, not fewer.
Slominski said the administration was engaging in a debate that will ultimately lead to a loss of consumer confidence and trust in dairy products.
Brendon Cull, representing Kroger, said his company pays a premium for milk that is rbST-free because it became clear from feedback that customers are demanding it.
''We believe strongly that our milk, which is no longer from cows treated with rbST, should be labeled as such,'' Cull said.
Rob Bouick, an Ohio dairy farmer, applauded Strickland and the department for having the courage to stand up to Kroger, the dairy foods association and other ''anti-technology activists'' that he said were using demagoguery to exploit the labeling issue.
Bouick said the milk marketers forced him to stop using rbST or face not having his milk on grocery shelves, and his production fell 20 percent.
''IDFA claims they speak for farmers. They don't speak for me,'' Bouick said.
James Armstrong, a consumer from Columbus, said he grew up on a family farm in Nebraska and is careful to read labels to avoid artificial ingredients.
''I just want the plain simple truth,'' Armstrong said.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
