Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Family found dead in Ohio home
Man gets 3 years in prison for having sex with horse
Sex-toy study at Duke University raises some eyebrows
Robbers order bar patrons to empty pockets
Akron man turns himself in after authorities turn up heat
Man appears alive at own funeral
Take comfort in knowing Browns could be bigger losers
Brown still testing Cavs' lineup
High school sports scoreboard - Nov. 7
Judicial colleagues give magistrate job to judge who lost election
Warriors give coach perfect birthday gift: regional title
Akron police follow blood trail to murder suspect
Blogs:
Pets:
Not 101 Dalmations…but close!
The Heldenfiles:
Friday Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
For your perusal
Akron Zips:
The morning after
Tribe Matters:
Tribe makes roster moves
Cleveland Browns:
Lewis doesn't like boycott
Kent State Sports:
Kent State falls to Akron, 20-28
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs at Knicks
Buckeye Blogging:
Weekly ‘B’ Deck Report – New Mexico St.
Varsity Letters:
Wrestling, bowling teams prepare for season
All Da King's Men:
If It Looks Like Islamic Terrorism…
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Dems Message To Women: Don't Enjoy The Sex
Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (62) The Stupak Amendment
See Jane Style:
Muffle Your Muffler
Car Chase:
Perfect Weather for an Autumn Drive
Let's Talk Real Estate:
RUMORS: Downtown Restaurant Explosion
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jack is looking for a trip to Southern Ohio the week of November 16.
Sound Check:
The Black Keys to perform benefit concert at Musica on November 27
HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why People Do Not Live in Northeast Ohio
Akron Gamer:
New 'Call of Duty' could set entertainment record
By Dennis J. Willard
Beacon Journal staff writer
POSTED: 07:25 p.m. EDT, Mar 12, 2008
COLUMBUS: Got milk controversy.
Whenever farmers or milk producers state their cartons are ''rbST-free,'' an acronym for Monsanto's artificial growth hormone recombinant bovine somatotropin, the ag-tech giant wants equal time on the label.
Monsanto and the Ohio Farm Bureau have lobbied in Ohio to ensure ''rbST-free'' milk labels also contain a disclaimer in the same size and color typeface stating the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has found no significant difference between milk from cows injected or not injected with the artificial hormone.
Gov. Ted Strickland agreed, issuing an emergency rule on Feb. 7 through the Ohio Department of Agriculture granting Monsanto's and the farm bureau's wish.
Some farmers in Ohio have felt pressured by large distributors like the Kroger Co. to move away from injecting their cows with artificial hormones or risk not being on the shelves in the grocery chain.
Critics, including the International Dairy Foods Association, the Ohio Farmers Union, organic milk producers and environmental groups, maintain the Monsanto rule is burdensome and effectively kills any effort to label milk as rbST-free.
The department has until 5 p.m. today to decide whether to move ahead with plans to make the emergency rule permanent through approval from the Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review (JCARR).
On Wednesday, Lewis R. Jones, the department's dairy division chief, and legal counsel David Gorman, listened to 27 witnesses testify for more than four hours, a majority of whom oppose Strickland's disclaimer rule.
The hearing would have been longer, but Jones and Gorman asked no questions and anyone who wanted to add more to their testimony had until the end of the day to put their rebuttals in writing.
After, Jones said leaders in the department, including the director, Robert Boggs, would meet, review the testimony and decide whether to rescind the order, recommend changes or submit the rule to JCARR as originally written.
For more than 14 years, since the FDA approved the use of rbST, more and more farmers and milk producers have labeled their product as hormone free, especially in recent years, as organic goods have become more popular and profitable.
Lawyers and scientists lined up Wednesday arguing over whether Monsanto's hormone has been banned in Canada and a large part of the European Union, if Strickland's rule violates Interstate Commerce rights, the FDA's credibility and the warnings on rbST's packaging.
They also debated the definition of free speech with each side having a different take on what is needed to fully inform the public.
Critics of the rule argue what is known as ''absence labeling'' has worked great for more than a decade. When a producer states something is rbST-free, they are absence labeling.
Monsanto believes absence labeling sends a message that the hormone is inherently bad, and points out that the FDA approved rbST.
Stacey Slater, Monsanto's assistant general counsel, told Lewis and Gorman that the governor's rule ensures the FDA's findings are fully disclosed.
She said producers do not have to label their milk, but if they insist they are hormone free then they must explain the ''whole truth'' to consumers.
Jerry Slominski, senior vice-president for the dairy foods association, said the rule should be rescinded because consumers want more choices in the dairy case, not fewer.
Slominski said the administration was engaging in a debate that will ultimately lead to a loss of consumer confidence and trust in dairy products.
Brendon Cull, representing Kroger, said his company pays a premium for milk that is rbST-free because it became clear from feedback that customers are demanding it.
''We believe strongly that our milk, which is no longer from cows treated with rbST, should be labeled as such,'' Cull said.
Rob Bouick, an Ohio dairy farmer, applauded Strickland and the department for having the courage to stand up to Kroger, the dairy foods association and other ''anti-technology activists'' that he said were using demagoguery to exploit the labeling issue.
Bouick said the milk marketers forced him to stop using rbST or face not having his milk on grocery shelves, and his production fell 20 percent.
''IDFA claims they speak for farmers. They don't speak for me,'' Bouick said.
James Armstrong, a consumer from Columbus, said he grew up on a family farm in Nebraska and is careful to read labels to avoid artificial ingredients.
''I just want the plain simple truth,'' Armstrong said.
COLUMBUS: Got milk controversy.
Whenever farmers or milk producers state their cartons are ''rbST-free,'' an acronym for Monsanto's artificial growth hormone recombinant bovine somatotropin, the ag-tech giant wants equal time on the label.
Monsanto and the Ohio Farm Bureau have lobbied in Ohio to ensure ''rbST-free'' milk labels also contain a disclaimer in the same size and color typeface stating the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has found no significant difference between milk from cows injected or not injected with the artificial hormone.
Gov. Ted Strickland agreed, issuing an emergency rule on Feb. 7 through the Ohio Department of Agriculture granting Monsanto's and the farm bureau's wish.
Some farmers in Ohio have felt pressured by large distributors like the Kroger Co. to move away from injecting their cows with artificial hormones or risk not being on the shelves in the grocery chain.
Critics, including the International Dairy Foods Association, the Ohio Farmers Union, organic milk producers and environmental groups, maintain the Monsanto rule is burdensome and effectively kills any effort to label milk as rbST-free.
The department has until 5 p.m. today to decide whether to move ahead with plans to make the emergency rule permanent through approval from the Joint Committee on Agency Rule Review (JCARR).
On Wednesday, Lewis R. Jones, the department's dairy division chief, and legal counsel David Gorman, listened to 27 witnesses testify for more than four hours, a majority of whom oppose Strickland's disclaimer rule.
The hearing would have been longer, but Jones and Gorman asked no questions and anyone who wanted to add more to their testimony had until the end of the day to put their rebuttals in writing.
After, Jones said leaders in the department, including the director, Robert Boggs, would meet, review the testimony and decide whether to rescind the order, recommend changes or submit the rule to JCARR as originally written.
For more than 14 years, since the FDA approved the use of rbST, more and more farmers and milk producers have labeled their product as hormone free, especially in recent years, as organic goods have become more popular and profitable.
Lawyers and scientists lined up Wednesday arguing over whether Monsanto's hormone has been banned in Canada and a large part of the European Union, if Strickland's rule violates Interstate Commerce rights, the FDA's credibility and the warnings on rbST's packaging.
They also debated the definition of free speech with each side having a different take on what is needed to fully inform the public.
Critics of the rule argue what is known as ''absence labeling'' has worked great for more than a decade. When a producer states something is rbST-free, they are absence labeling.
Monsanto believes absence labeling sends a message that the hormone is inherently bad, and points out that the FDA approved rbST.
Stacey Slater, Monsanto's assistant general counsel, told Lewis and Gorman that the governor's rule ensures the FDA's findings are fully disclosed.
She said producers do not have to label their milk, but if they insist they are hormone free then they must explain the ''whole truth'' to consumers.
Jerry Slominski, senior vice-president for the dairy foods association, said the rule should be rescinded because consumers want more choices in the dairy case, not fewer.
Slominski said the administration was engaging in a debate that will ultimately lead to a loss of consumer confidence and trust in dairy products.
Brendon Cull, representing Kroger, said his company pays a premium for milk that is rbST-free because it became clear from feedback that customers are demanding it.
''We believe strongly that our milk, which is no longer from cows treated with rbST, should be labeled as such,'' Cull said.
Rob Bouick, an Ohio dairy farmer, applauded Strickland and the department for having the courage to stand up to Kroger, the dairy foods association and other ''anti-technology activists'' that he said were using demagoguery to exploit the labeling issue.
Bouick said the milk marketers forced him to stop using rbST or face not having his milk on grocery shelves, and his production fell 20 percent.
''IDFA claims they speak for farmers. They don't speak for me,'' Bouick said.
James Armstrong, a consumer from Columbus, said he grew up on a family farm in Nebraska and is careful to read labels to avoid artificial ingredients.
''I just want the plain simple truth,'' Armstrong said.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
