Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Pets:
Cat-loving chihuahua suckles seven abandoned kittens

The Heldenfiles:
Friday Night Notebook

Patrick McManamon:
For your Saturday entertainment …

Akron Zips:
Hitchens leads Zips in second-half comeback

Tribe Matters:
Seven players added to Tribe’s 40-man roster

Cleveland Browns:
Holmgren expresses interest in Browns position

Kent State Sports:
Kent State blown out in second half, loses to Temple 47-13

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs vs. Philadelphia 76ers

Buckeye Blogging:
OSU – Michigan college football rivals meet in Baghdad

Varsity Letters:
Four area football teams play tonight

All Da King's Men:
Headed For Disaster

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Will Health Care Reform Pass?

Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (68) Democrats Secure 60 Votes for Cloture

See Jane Style:
Vintage Chic

Car Chase:
TIME TO GET YOUR COLLECTOR CARS WINTERIZED

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Silverdome Potentially SOLD!

Ohio Travels with Betty:
George is looking for a Thanksgiving buffet in Akron.

Sound Check:
Steely Dan Plays "The Royal Scam" at E.J. Thomas Hall

HRLite House:
Colloquium at University of Akron

Akron Gamer:
Nintendo's Mario endures even as games come and go

Ohio Supreme Court tells county judge to pick up the pace

By John Seewer
Associated Press writer

The Ohio Supreme Court scolded a county judge today for taking too much time in ruling on cases before his court, some which languished for up to two years.

It's the first time the court has disciplined a judge for failing to manage cases in a timely manner.

The state's high court reviewed the work of Sandusky County Judge Harry Sargeant Jr. and said it found unnecessary delays in cases that included child-support and divorce disputes.

Ohio Chief Justice Thomas Moyer said unjustified delays diminish confidence in the legal system and had a profound impact on those involved, including children.

Sargeant left many people ''in a legal limbo, often for a period of years,'' Moyer wrote in the court's 6-1 opinion.

All courts in Ohio have rules that set guidelines on how long cases should take to be resolved.

Sargeant, who has been a judge in Sandusky County since 1979, often kept cases pending for longer than the time guidelines, according to the court, which reviewed the judge's cases from 1998 through 2007.

Sargeant's attorney, Charles Kettlewell, said today that the delays were caused by a need for more staff and miscommunications between the court and attorneys who had cases before the judge.

The court said Sargeant agreed that he violated provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct. The court also noted that he cooperated fully in the disciplinary proceedings and has hired a law clerk to help with his caseload.

In one divorce case filed in September 2003, Sargeant conducted a hearing a year later, but he did not make a final decision until August 2006 after an attorney filed a grievance. The woman who filed for divorce and her attorney had twice before asked the judge when a decision would be made, the court said.

Time guidelines for courts say that divorce cases involving children should be resolved within 18 months while divorces without children should be taken care of within a year.

AP-CS-05-20-08 1537EDT

The Ohio Supreme Court scolded a county judge today for taking too much time in ruling on cases before his court, some which languished for up to two years.

It's the first time the court has disciplined a judge for failing to manage cases in a timely manner.

The state's high court reviewed the work of Sandusky County Judge Harry Sargeant Jr. and said it found unnecessary delays in cases that included child-support and divorce disputes.

Ohio Chief Justice Thomas Moyer said unjustified delays diminish confidence in the legal system and had a profound impact on those involved, including children.

Sargeant left many people ''in a legal limbo, often for a period of years,'' Moyer wrote in the court's 6-1 opinion.

All courts in Ohio have rules that set guidelines on how long cases should take to be resolved.

Sargeant, who has been a judge in Sandusky County since 1979, often kept cases pending for longer than the time guidelines, according to the court, which reviewed the judge's cases from 1998 through 2007.

Sargeant's attorney, Charles Kettlewell, said today that the delays were caused by a need for more staff and miscommunications between the court and attorneys who had cases before the judge.

The court said Sargeant agreed that he violated provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct. The court also noted that he cooperated fully in the disciplinary proceedings and has hired a law clerk to help with his caseload.

In one divorce case filed in September 2003, Sargeant conducted a hearing a year later, but he did not make a final decision until August 2006 after an attorney filed a grievance. The woman who filed for divorce and her attorney had twice before asked the judge when a decision would be made, the court said.

Time guidelines for courts say that divorce cases involving children should be resolved within 18 months while divorces without children should be taken care of within a year.

AP-CS-05-20-08 1537EDT



Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
















Most Commented Stories