Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Akron police investigate teen mob attack on family
Man found hanging at playground in Stow
Family is proud of late son's gift
Man shot in back near Akron park
Robbery suspect's body left at Akron hospital
Varejao's $50 million deal isn't really $50 million
FBI asked to investigate attack on white family near Firestone Park
Woman, 75, charged with beating fawn to death
Blogs:
Pets:
Zeke, the basketball playing dog
The Heldenfiles:
Friday Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
Dwayne Wade says no to Cleveland
Akron Zips:
Opponent outlook: Kent State
Browns Bulletin:
Quick thought on Browns rookies
Tribe Matters:
Now is no time to quit
Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth test showed marijuana
Kent State Sports:
Men's Basketball Scheduling update
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Andy’s Signed According to ESPN
All Da King's Men:
Baby Got Barack !
Blog of Mass Destruction:
As California Goes?
Akron Law Café:
Why do public officials violate Ohio Ethics Laws?
Varsity Letters:
Report: Ontko selects Wisconsin
See Jane Style:
Oh Baby!
Car Chase:
Where do We Go from Here?
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Closings….Not the Good Kind!
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Margy inquires-when is a Taste of Hudson?
Sound Check:
LeVert II live performance Saturday night — "Dedication" album due July 13,
HRLite House:
DDI One of Best Places to Work
Akron Gamer:
Video game sales drop in May
By John Seewer
Associated Press writer
POSTED: 03:06 p.m. EDT, May 20, 2008
The Ohio Supreme Court scolded a county judge today for taking too much time in ruling on cases before his court, some which languished for up to two years.
It's the first time the court has disciplined a judge for failing to manage cases in a timely manner.
The state's high court reviewed the work of Sandusky County Judge Harry Sargeant Jr. and said it found unnecessary delays in cases that included child-support and divorce disputes.
Ohio Chief Justice Thomas Moyer said unjustified delays diminish confidence in the legal system and had a profound impact on those involved, including children.
Sargeant left many people ''in a legal limbo, often for a period of years,'' Moyer wrote in the court's 6-1 opinion.
All courts in Ohio have rules that set guidelines on how long cases should take to be resolved.
Sargeant, who has been a judge in Sandusky County since 1979, often kept cases pending for longer than the time guidelines, according to the court, which reviewed the judge's cases from 1998 through 2007.
Sargeant's attorney, Charles Kettlewell, said today that the delays were caused by a need for more staff and miscommunications between the court and attorneys who had cases before the judge.
The court said Sargeant agreed that he violated provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct. The court also noted that he cooperated fully in the disciplinary proceedings and has hired a law clerk to help with his caseload.
In one divorce case filed in September 2003, Sargeant conducted a hearing a year later, but he did not make a final decision until August 2006 after an attorney filed a grievance. The woman who filed for divorce and her attorney had twice before asked the judge when a decision would be made, the court said.
Time guidelines for courts say that divorce cases involving children should be resolved within 18 months while divorces without children should be taken care of within a year.
AP-CS-05-20-08 1537EDT
The Ohio Supreme Court scolded a county judge today for taking too much time in ruling on cases before his court, some which languished for up to two years.
It's the first time the court has disciplined a judge for failing to manage cases in a timely manner.
The state's high court reviewed the work of Sandusky County Judge Harry Sargeant Jr. and said it found unnecessary delays in cases that included child-support and divorce disputes.
Ohio Chief Justice Thomas Moyer said unjustified delays diminish confidence in the legal system and had a profound impact on those involved, including children.
Sargeant left many people ''in a legal limbo, often for a period of years,'' Moyer wrote in the court's 6-1 opinion.
All courts in Ohio have rules that set guidelines on how long cases should take to be resolved.
Sargeant, who has been a judge in Sandusky County since 1979, often kept cases pending for longer than the time guidelines, according to the court, which reviewed the judge's cases from 1998 through 2007.
Sargeant's attorney, Charles Kettlewell, said today that the delays were caused by a need for more staff and miscommunications between the court and attorneys who had cases before the judge.
The court said Sargeant agreed that he violated provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct. The court also noted that he cooperated fully in the disciplinary proceedings and has hired a law clerk to help with his caseload.
In one divorce case filed in September 2003, Sargeant conducted a hearing a year later, but he did not make a final decision until August 2006 after an attorney filed a grievance. The woman who filed for divorce and her attorney had twice before asked the judge when a decision would be made, the court said.
Time guidelines for courts say that divorce cases involving children should be resolved within 18 months while divorces without children should be taken care of within a year.
AP-CS-05-20-08 1537EDT
Comments
Click here to post your comments
