Container Top
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


First Bell - On Education:
No City of Akron basketball tonight

Pets:
Pet telethon re-airs

The Heldenfiles:
Chipmunks "Squeakquel" on DVD/BD March 30

Akron Zips:
Late surge gives Zips ugly road win

Tribe Matters:
Blogmail response on Hafner

Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth's contract terminated

Balanced Ledger:
QB in Browns future: another mock draft

Kent State Sports:
KSU Notes – February 9

Cleveland Cavaliers:
NBA Power Rankings from Around the Internet

Buckeye Blogging:
Buckeyes grab 18 players on signing day

Varsity Letters:
Garfield at Buchtel basketball

All Da King's Men:
Palin At The Tea Party Convention

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Republican Pre-Conditions

Akron Law Café:
Law, Love and Chocolate

Car Chase:
Collector Car Hobby Loses One of the Best—Jim Roll

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Decisions Decisions: Credit Cards or Your Mortgage?

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Loucile is looking for a Lake Erie getaway in June for three kids, ages 1, 3, and 5.

Sound Check:
Talk of the Town – Top entertainment picks for the weekend

HRLite House:
OFCCP Report

Akron Gamer:
Makers of 'Castle Crashers' unveil 'BattleBlock Theater'

See Jane Style:
Do IT this week: Layering

Obama team expected to broker deal on subpoenas

By Lara Jakes Jordan
Associated Press

WASHINGTON: A years-long legal dispute between the White House and Congress over testimony by President Bush's aides likely will be resolved under the incoming Obama administration, former government lawyers from both political parties agreed today.

Additionally, the lawyers said Democratic President-elect Obama probably will seek to declassify more Justice Department legal memos — as well as documents across the federal government — than did the outgoing GOP administration.

Robert Litt, a former prosecutor and top Justice Department criminal lawyer during the Clinton administration, said it's safe to assume that ''a serious review of the classification system is on the table.''

Added former Reagan White House Counsel Arthur Culvahouse: ''It's simply good government for (legal memos) to be open to review as much as possible.''

The men spoke at a Brookings Institution discussion about legal policy in the Obama administration.

Both lawyers said Obama will likely broker a compromise with the Democratic-led Congress over whether to force top Bush aide Joshua Bolten and former aide Harriet Miers to testify in front of lawmakers or hand over documents about the 2006 firings of nine U.S. attorneys.

Democrats say the firings, which led to the resignation of former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales last year, were politically motivated. That charge was bolstered by an internal Justice Department investigation, which in September found ''substantial evidence that partisan political considerations played a part in the removal of several of the U.S. attorneys.''

The Justice Department has maintained that Congress can't force top White House aides to testify because it infringes on the executive branch's independence.

A federal appeals court last month refused to immediately enforce the House Democrats' subpoenas, ruling that time will run out on this year's congressional session before the thorny legal skirmish could be resolved.

Litt, who is informally advising the incoming Obama administration, predicted the Democrats will move quickly next year to push forward with the subpoenas.

He called it reasonable to believe that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi will ask the White House to reconsider its use of executive privilege in the dispute.

However, Litt said, Obama more likely will hammer out a compromise for Democrats to get at least some of the information they want. Litt said it would likely be done without forcing the subpoena issue that could set a long-lasting precedence for future White House dealings with Congress.

Culvahouse said he agreed that a deal likely will be stuck between the two sides in a political detente that had eluded the Bush administration.

WASHINGTON: A years-long legal dispute between the White House and Congress over testimony by President Bush's aides likely will be resolved under the incoming Obama administration, former government lawyers from both political parties agreed today.

Additionally, the lawyers said Democratic President-elect Obama probably will seek to declassify more Justice Department legal memos — as well as documents across the federal government — than did the outgoing GOP administration.

Robert Litt, a former prosecutor and top Justice Department criminal lawyer during the Clinton administration, said it's safe to assume that ''a serious review of the classification system is on the table.''

Added former Reagan White House Counsel Arthur Culvahouse: ''It's simply good government for (legal memos) to be open to review as much as possible.''

The men spoke at a Brookings Institution discussion about legal policy in the Obama administration.

Both lawyers said Obama will likely broker a compromise with the Democratic-led Congress over whether to force top Bush aide Joshua Bolten and former aide Harriet Miers to testify in front of lawmakers or hand over documents about the 2006 firings of nine U.S. attorneys.

Democrats say the firings, which led to the resignation of former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales last year, were politically motivated. That charge was bolstered by an internal Justice Department investigation, which in September found ''substantial evidence that partisan political considerations played a part in the removal of several of the U.S. attorneys.''

The Justice Department has maintained that Congress can't force top White House aides to testify because it infringes on the executive branch's independence.

A federal appeals court last month refused to immediately enforce the House Democrats' subpoenas, ruling that time will run out on this year's congressional session before the thorny legal skirmish could be resolved.

Litt, who is informally advising the incoming Obama administration, predicted the Democrats will move quickly next year to push forward with the subpoenas.

He called it reasonable to believe that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi will ask the White House to reconsider its use of executive privilege in the dispute.

However, Litt said, Obama more likely will hammer out a compromise for Democrats to get at least some of the information they want. Litt said it would likely be done without forcing the subpoena issue that could set a long-lasting precedence for future White House dealings with Congress.

Culvahouse said he agreed that a deal likely will be stuck between the two sides in a political detente that had eluded the Bush administration.




Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button


The Reverend
Kent, Oh

Posted 04:12 PM, 11/12/2008

The political motivation in the firings was over those Bush appointed U.S. Attorneys refusal to investigate voter fraud when evidence did not justify bringing a case. The Bush White House was attempting to game elections.


Shelly the Journalist

Posted 04:53 PM, 11/12/2008

Ha! Rich--that is rich. Obama is going to decorate the White House with Acorns and you are blaming Bush for that very same thing


jenkins
Hudson, Oh

Posted 05:23 PM, 11/12/2008

Actually it is quite different Micheala. REGISTRATION fraud is what some ACORN workers are accused of. Not Obama.
Please read the article above to inform yourself.


Shelly the Journalist

Posted 06:02 PM, 11/12/2008

Guess if you say Acorn, the ABJ will censure you. That is why they only have one comment. Newsprint is so yesterday--that is why the Cleveland Lame Dealer is laying off all their staff.














Most Commented Stories