Container Top
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


First Bell - On Education:
No City of Akron basketball tonight

Pets:
Pet telethon re-airs

The Heldenfiles:
Chipmunks "Squeakquel" on DVD/BD March 30

Akron Zips:
Late surge gives Zips ugly road win

Tribe Matters:
Blogmail response on Hafner

Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth's contract terminated

Balanced Ledger:
QB in Browns future: another mock draft

Kent State Sports:
KSU Notes – February 9

Cleveland Cavaliers:
NBA Power Rankings from Around the Internet

Buckeye Blogging:
Buckeyes grab 18 players on signing day

Varsity Letters:
Garfield at Buchtel basketball

All Da King's Men:
Palin At The Tea Party Convention

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Republican Pre-Conditions

Akron Law Café:
Citizens United v. F.E.C. (Part 4): Kennedy's and O'Connor's Basic Approaches to Constitutional Decisionmaking – Top Down and Bottom Up

Car Chase:
Collector Car Hobby Loses One of the Best—Jim Roll

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Decisions Decisions: Credit Cards or Your Mortgage?

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Loucile is looking for a Lake Erie getaway in June for three kids, ages 1, 3, and 5.

Sound Check:
Talk of the Town – Top entertainment picks for the weekend

HRLite House:
Track HR Research

Akron Gamer:
Makers of 'Castle Crashers' unveil 'BattleBlock Theater'

See Jane Style:
Do IT this week: Layering

Developers propose rules for new Ohio casinos

By Associated Press

COLUMBUS: Developers of the casinos that voters approved for Ohio want a rule that would block communities from ''unreasonably'' holding up building permits or other local action.

A developers' proposal for carrying out the casino constitutional amendment that passed on Nov. 3 also would prohibit any gamblers younger than 21. And, it would order that 90 percent of casino jobs go to area residents in Cleveland, Cincinnati, Columbus and Toledo, the cities where the establishments will be built.

The Ohio Legislature has six months to pass a measure detailing how the casinos will be launched and operated. A spokesman for House Speaker Armond Budish (BYOO'-dish) says the developers' ideas submitted this week will be considered, but so will input from other interested parties.


Information from the Columbus Dispatch, http://www.dispatch.com.

COLUMBUS: Developers of the casinos that voters approved for Ohio want a rule that would block communities from ''unreasonably'' holding up building permits or other local action.

A developers' proposal for carrying out the casino constitutional amendment that passed on Nov. 3 also would prohibit any gamblers younger than 21. And, it would order that 90 percent of casino jobs go to area residents in Cleveland, Cincinnati, Columbus and Toledo, the cities where the establishments will be built.

The Ohio Legislature has six months to pass a measure detailing how the casinos will be launched and operated. A spokesman for House Speaker Armond Budish (BYOO'-dish) says the developers' ideas submitted this week will be considered, but so will input from other interested parties.


Information from the Columbus Dispatch, http://www.dispatch.com.




Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button


Wolf
Akron, Oh

Posted 09:57 AM, 11/18/2009

better start to bend over now...


Crime of the Century
Cuyahoga Falls, OH

Posted 09:59 AM, 11/18/2009

You'll do what you can to protect The Firm.


Commuter1950

Posted 10:37 AM, 11/18/2009

I thought the headline seemed odd, but reading that the 'rule' they want is free reign over everthing seems par for the course. I will not be surprised when the developers start to give reasons for locating the casinos 'just outside' city limits and they want their 'rule' in place to prevent communities from complaining.


Jon

Posted 11:30 AM, 11/18/2009

I'm failing to see how any of the items outlined in the proposal are bad:
- No gambling under 21 years of age.
- 90% local workers
- Forbids casino owners from donating to political campaigns
- No cash wagering

Doesn't sound like anybody's being bent over to me.


Jon

Posted 11:34 AM, 11/18/2009

@Commuter1950

The amendment itself specified actual parcels of land where the casinos would be built.


LuvMyNewf

Posted 11:57 AM, 11/18/2009

They need to do what they did in Niagara - put up a temporary site to get the money in and get people employed ASAP!


swami squeegee
cuyahoga falls, oh

Posted 12:06 PM, 11/18/2009

especially for the Toledo and Cinncinati areas, these will provide terrific jobs and cash infusion into local economies, but the effect is minimal with so many being around these days...but all the bogeyman stories are just that--stories...fiction...the facts are, jobs are good, and since our Congress has sold off all bouyant the manufacturing jobs to overseas sources for greed, casinos are the new urban development


Zapdog
Norton, Oh

Posted 12:22 PM, 11/18/2009

I can understand the reasoning for the request. Anti gambling title-holders such as Mayors, Council Persons, Inspectors, etc., good intentionally thwart the efforts of construction in an attempt to undermine completion on a timely schedule. Cleveland, the area closest to me, is the one I am worried about. Cuyahoga Country has been shown to be so corrupt that you can imagine officials taking money from both sides.


Zapdog
Norton, Oh

Posted 12:23 PM, 11/18/2009

**good - could intentionally**


bbolerrn

Posted 12:29 PM, 11/18/2009

I agree who really cares that the owners want some say in how they will be regulated. It is important that there be no unreasonable delays in permits for construction. The thing is some politicians who have voters who did not want the casino's in the first place will hold up progress to give the illusion that they are doing what the people want. I think it is a capital idea to set up temporary sites until the facilities are complete. How many venues such as the Carosel are sitting dormant. You could give those who want to wager what they want and put some people to work today.

I don't care how much tax the casino's will pay. They will pay some and the workers will definately pay. All of something is a whole lot better then a whole lot of nothing any day.

If you don't want to gamble, don't go it is not going to cost you anything either way. So it is not "bend over", it is smart to want some say in the regulation of your particular business. All businesses do it be it through contributions or direct contact with the state house.

I want people working and that is all anyone should want.


Paul
Akron, OH

Posted 12:30 PM, 11/18/2009

The state should survey other gambling locations and find what rules the locals wished they had included in hindsight. These rules requests should work both ways!


citizenk62
uniontown, oh

Posted 01:55 PM, 11/18/2009

I did not read anything in the proposal ideas that was a negative for us citizens. If and when the politicians take over most of the casino rules and regulation and required procedures then we will see the entire idea spiral downward and nothing will get done. How about letting the casino OWNERS build and run THEIR operation the way they want and need to, make their profit, pay the STATE, COUNTY, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS their cut and leave us folks that want to do some gaming alone.


A Voice
Akron, , OH

Posted 08:11 AM, 11/19/2009

bend over!!














Most Commented Stories