Container Top
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


First Bell - On Education:
No City of Akron basketball tonight

Pets:
Pet telethon re-airs

The Heldenfiles:
Chipmunks "Squeakquel" on DVD/BD March 30

Akron Zips:
Zips favored on road against MAC West leader

Tribe Matters:
Blogmail response on Hafner

Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth's contract terminated

Balanced Ledger:
QB in Browns future: another mock draft

Kent State Sports:
KSU Notes – February 9

Cleveland Cavaliers:
NBA Power Rankings from Around the Internet

Buckeye Blogging:
Buckeyes grab 18 players on signing day

Varsity Letters:
Five local gridders to play in Big33

All Da King's Men:
Palin At The Tea Party Convention

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Republican Pre-Conditions

Akron Law Café:
Law, Love and Chocolate

Car Chase:
Collector Car Hobby Loses One of the Best—Jim Roll

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Decisions Decisions: Credit Cards or Your Mortgage?

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Loucile is looking for a Lake Erie getaway in June for three kids, ages 1, 3, and 5.

Sound Check:
Talk of the Town – Top entertainment picks for the weekend

HRLite House:
OFCCP Report

Akron Gamer:
Makers of 'Castle Crashers' unveil 'BattleBlock Theater'

See Jane Style:
Do IT this week: Layering

Treating addicts costs less than jailing them

Therapy proponents wonder if U.S. officials will step up and expand federal funding of drug-counseling programs

By David Crary
Associated Press

NEW YORK: Based on the rhetoric, America's war on drugs seems poised to shift into a more enlightened phase where treatment of addicts gains favor over imprisonment of low-level offenders. Questions abound, however, about the nation's readiness to turn the talk into reality.

The economic case for expanding treatment, especially amid a recession, seems clear. Study after study concludes that treating addicts, even in lengthy residential programs, costs markedly less than incarcerating them, so budget-strapped states could save millions.

The unmet need for more treatment also is vast. According to federal data, 7.6 million Americans needed treatment for illicit drug use in 2008, and only 1.2 million — or 16 percent — received it.

But the prospect of savings on prison and court costs hasn't produced a surge of new fiscal support for treatment. California's latest crisis budget, for example, strips all but a small fraction of state funding away from a successful diversion and treatment program that voters approved in 2000.

''It's easy to talk a good game about more treatment and helping people,'' said Scott Burns, executive director of
the National District Attorneys Association. ''But it smashes head on into reality when they don't put their money where their mouth is.''

Money aside, the treatment field faces multiple challenges. At many programs, counselors — often former addicts themselves — are low-paid, and turnover is high. Many states have yet to impose effective systems for evaluating programs, a crucial issue in a field where success is relative and relapses inevitable.

''Fifty percent of clients who enter treatment complete it successfully — that means we're losing half,'' said Raquel Jeffers, director of New Jersey's Division of Addiction Services. ''We can do better.''

The appointment of treatment expert Tom McLellan as deputy director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy in April was seen as part of a shift of priorities for the drug czar's office.

Greater openness

McLellan said he sees greater openness to expanding treatment but also deep misunderstanding or ignorance about scientific advances in the field and the need to integrate it into the health-care system.

Most Americans, he suggested, have an image of drug treatment formed from the movies — ''cartoon treatment'' involving emotional group encounters — and are unaware of a new wave of medications and other therapies that haven't gained wide use despite proven effectiveness

''For the first time, it can truly be said that we know what to do — we know the things that work,'' he said. ''But do we have the economic and political willingness to put them into place? If we do, we'll see results.''

McLellan, insisting he's not ''a wild-eyed liberal,'' said expanding treatment wouldn't negate the war on drugs.

''Law enforcement is necessary, but it's not sufficient,'' he said. ''You need effective preventive services, addiction and mental-health services integrated with the rest of medicine. You shouldn't have to go to some squalid little place across the railroad tracks.''

By federal count, there are more than 13,640 treatment programs nationwide, ranging from world-class to dubious and mostly operating apart from the mainstream health-care industry.

Dr. H. Westley Clark, director of the federal Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, said his agency wants states to develop better measurements of programs' performance.

''The data shows treatment saves money — $1 spent to $4 or $7 saved,'' Clark said. ''If you're an altruist, making treatment available is a good thing. If you're a narcissist, it's a good thing — you'd pay less in taxes.''

Treatment advocates are closely watching Congress, hoping the pending health-care overhaul will expand insurance coverage for substance-abuse programs. Recent federal data indicates that 37 percent of those seeking treatment don't get it because they can't pay for it — and many land in prison.

The work force in drug treatment is, for the most part, modestly paid, with counselors often earning less than the $40,000 per year that it costs to keep an inmate in prison in many states.

''Some of the stigma that goes with addiction adheres to the staff as well,'' Jeffers said. ''Most agencies are trying to do right — but the field is getting increasingly complicated. The business skills that are needed aren't always the same skills that make a good clinician.''

Personal experience

Yet generally, front-line counselors win high praise — especially the ex-addicts who bring savvy and credibility to the job.

''People in the field weren't driven to it by the money or glamour, but often by personal experience or that of a loved one,'' said Keith Humphreys, a treatment expert from Stanford University now working for the drug czar's office. ''They may not have the fanciest degrees, but they are incredibly caring.''

Garnett Wilson served prison time for armed robbery in the 1980s and now — at 61 — has two decades of drug counseling under his belt as a valued employee of the Fortune Society, which provides support services to ex-offenders in New York City.

As he cajoles the men in his groups, he strives to remember his own battle to change.

''Some of the people who've been through it become too rigid,'' he said. ''Preaching doesn't work. They forget how hard it is to rise above your environment, and they alienate the people they're trying to help.''

Wilson said he focuses his efforts on ''those guys that are ready.''

Perhaps Joe Smith is one of them.

A 29-year-old from Brooklyn, Smith recently served eight months in prison for a weapons offense and was a heavy marijuana user, but now — studying and job-hunting — says he's determined to go straight.

''It's been kind of tough,'' he said. ''The hardest part is just to come to it every day, but when you come to think about it, it's not so hard — because if you don't, it's back to jail.''

Another client, Ronnie Johnson, has been back in New York City barely a month after more than a decade in prison upstate.

''It's like family here — everybody's supportive,'' said Johnson, 39, contrasting the Fortune Society staff with drug-treatment workers in prison who were ''just doing it for a paycheck.''

NEW YORK: Based on the rhetoric, America's war on drugs seems poised to shift into a more enlightened phase where treatment of addicts gains favor over imprisonment of low-level offenders. Questions abound, however, about the nation's readiness to turn the talk into reality.

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button


Cannoli Eater
Akron, Oh

Posted 02:26 PM, 11/09/2009

I got an idea! Lets make all drugs legal and have places where drug users can go to use them and if some kill them self, well we can call that weeding out the garden. By doing that it would eliminate the criminal element overnight. No more crack dealers on the corners selling crack. In the so called drug war, in the last 50 years of fighting it,we have not made any ground. If anything, we have lost ground and the demand for drugs has grown into a very lucrative monster.


Love Stinks
Munroe Falls , oh

Posted 10:31 PM, 11/09/2009

well said Cannoli Eater!!














Most Commented Stories