Events Calendar
In This Section
Lethal mix's creator OK with new method
Legislators deadlock on budget
Justice Scalia speaks about Constitution in Ohio
Braylon Edwards pleads not guilty to assault count
Many aid Fostoria soldier's recovery
Ohio pays bill in 'Joe the Plumber' case
Cleveland mayor considers charging nonprofit groups
FBI digs in murder suspect's yard
Most Read Stories
Police accuse bank robbery suspect of gobbling up note (with dashcam video)
Victim of beating in Kent last week is declared dead at Akron hospital
Can DNA tests free ex-Akron captain?
Dad accused of forcing son into field, killing him
Man found dead in North Akron home is identified
Does it work? Test team returns to try out new products advertised on television
Blogs:
Pets:
Cat-loving chihuahua suckles seven abandoned kittens
The Heldenfiles:
Sunday Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
Browns sick after sick loss in Detroit
Akron Zips:
Zips advance to Sweet Sixteen
Tribe Matters:
Seven players added to Tribe’s 40-man roster
Cleveland Browns:
Post-game defensive quotes
Kent State Sports:
Kent State defeats Rochester College, 63-44
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs vs. Philadelphia 76ers
Buckeye Blogging:
OSU – Michigan college football rivals meet in Baghdad
Varsity Letters:
Four area football teams play tonight
All Da King's Men:
The Sunday Sanity Challenge
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Will Health Care Reform Pass?
Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (69) The Brookings Institute Study on "Bending the Curve" – Four General Strategies
See Jane Style:
Vintage Chic
Car Chase:
TIME TO GET YOUR COLLECTOR CARS WINTERIZED
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Silverdome Potentially SOLD!
Ohio Travels with Betty:
George is looking for a Thanksgiving buffet in Akron.
Sound Check:
Steely Dan Plays "The Royal Scam" at E.J. Thomas Hall
HRLite House:
Personal Rant – You are All Wrong About Jobs, or the Lack of Jobs, Being the Reason People Do Not Live in NEO
Akron Gamer:
Nintendo's Mario endures even as games come and go
Five years after the state imposed malpractice limits, doctors are still quitting, complaining of high insurance costs
By Andrew Welsh-Huggins
Associated Press
Published on Monday, Mar 24, 2008
COLUMBUS: When Bobbie Cameron became pregnant with her third child, she reluctantly chose a new doctor to oversee her care. Her longtime physician had dropped out of the birthing business because of soaring malpractice insurance rates.
Cameron's daughter, Avery, was born in February 2007. The experience just wasn't the same.
''We had to go to someone we didn't know, who didn't know my history, who didn't know how my last two births went,'' said Cameron, 31, a full-time mom in nearby Plain City.
Five years after a law trying to reduce the malpractice rates took effect, Ohio has fewer doctors who deliver babies than at the height of protests about high costs.
Ohio had 1,327 doctors listing obstetrics and gynecology as their primary specialty at the end of 2007, a 5 percent decrease from 2002, according to an AP analysis of State Medical Board numbers.
The overall number of doctors in Ohio rose
during the same time, from about 28,000 to about 30,000. Those figures represent all doctors and not just those in high-risk specialties.
The Republican-sponsored 2003 law caps most jury awards for pain and suffering in medical malpractice cases at $350,000 but allows up to $1 million in cases with multiple victims — such as injuries to a mother and baby during a delivery — and injuries considered catastrophic.
Supporters of caps had argued that large jury verdicts and frivolous lawsuits were driving up insurance rates and forcing doctors with high-risk specialties such as obstetrics to leave the profession.
Supporters, such as the Ohio State Medical Association, say malpractice rates are still too high for obstetricians and others in high-risk specialties. They also say Ohio has not recovered from losing doctors who quit delivering babies or left the state because of high rates.
Opponents of caps, such as the Ohio Association for Justice, which represents trial lawyers, say if the limits worked, the state would have more doctors delivering babies, not fewer. The opponents had said insurance rates were increasing not because of jury awards but because insurance companies were raising prices to make up for stock market losses.
New technology
Experts say there could be any number of reasons Ohio has fewer obstetricians, from rising medical costs of all kinds to the increasingly sophisticated technology used to deliver babies, which may be forcing old-style obstetricians to rethink the specialty.
In the past, ''if there was a problem with a delivery, the baby usually didn't survive very long. Now we have the technology to keep these infants alive,'' said Maxwell Mehlman, a professor of law and medicine at Case Western Reserve University.
''That increases the costs to a physician of being adjudged negligent. It's become a high-tech practice with severe consequences for malpractice.''
The astronomic rates by which insurance premiums grew — an average of 31 percent in 2002 — began to slow in 2005 and 2006. In 2007, premiums shrank slightly.
But even with those improvements, doctors in high-risk areas such as obstetrics are still paying tens of thousands of dollars a year in insurance premiums.
On average, obstetricians in Ohio paid about four times the rate of doctors in internal medicine in 2007, according to the 2007 survey by Medical Liability Monitor, a newsletter that analyzes the medical malpractice insurance industry.
In Greater Cleveland, the base premium rate for obstetricians insured by American Physicians Assurance Corp. was $194,293, compared with $43,192 for internal medicine physicians, the survey showed.
In 2001, Cleveland-area obstetricians insured by the same company were paying a base rate of $84,029, a figure that jumped to $120,275 by 2003, a 43 percent increase.
Interpreting data
Supporters and opponents of caps on jury awards offered wildly varying data on the need for legislative changes, sometimes referred to as tort reform.
Proponents said caps were required to rein in jury verdicts averaging as high as $3.5 million nationally by 2002 and annual insurance increases of 30 percent or more.
Opponents delivered their own data that found no evidence of jury verdicts spiraling out of control. For example, they argued that surgeons in states with caps paid an average of $26,746 in premiums, compared to $26,144 paid by surgeons in states without caps.
Independent experts said there was little data either way.
It's difficult to measure the impact of caps, especially since such laws are still relatively recent. In addition, the growth of insurance rates has been leveling off in recent years, including in states that did not pass caps, according to Medical Liability Monitor.
In the fall of 2002, family practitioner Dr. Sarah Sams rallied at the Statehouse in favor of Ohio's pain-and-suffering cap and Republican state Supreme Court candidates she believed would be sympathetic to the limits.
Three months later, then-Gov. Bob Taft signed into law the bill that Sams supported. But two years later, her rates still high and before premiums began to fall, Sams was forced to give up delivering babies anyway.
Eventually, she went to work for a self-insured hospital that allowed her to deliver babies again. But it was too late for Bobbie Cameron, one of Sams' favorite patients.
''I was devastated when I gave it up. It was very, very difficult,'' said Sams, 43, of suburban Columbus. ''Here were people I had a long-standing relationship with who wanted to continue with me but couldn't. And that's hard.''
COLUMBUS: When Bobbie Cameron became pregnant with her third child, she reluctantly chose a new doctor to oversee her care. Her longtime physician had dropped out of the birthing business because of soaring malpractice insurance rates.
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
