Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Pets:
Not 101 Dalmations…but close!

The Heldenfiles:
Friday Notebook

Patrick McManamon:
For your perusal

Akron Zips:
No. 1 UA soccer remains perfect, Zips football defeats rival Flashes

Tribe Matters:
Tribe makes roster moves

Cleveland Browns:
Lewis doesn't like boycott

Kent State Sports:
Kent State falls to Akron, 20-28

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs at Knicks

Buckeye Blogging:
Weekly ‘B’ Deck Report – New Mexico St.

Varsity Letters:
Wrestling, bowling teams prepare for season

All Da King's Men:
Bigger And Better Boondoggles

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Dems Message To Women: Don't Enjoy The Sex

Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (62) The Stupak Amendment

See Jane Style:
Muffle Your Muffler

Car Chase:
Perfect Weather for an Autumn Drive

Let's Talk Real Estate:
RUMORS: Downtown Restaurant Explosion

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jack is looking for a trip to Southern Ohio the week of November 16.

Sound Check:
The Black Keys to perform benefit concert at Musica on November 27

HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why People Do Not Live in Northeast Ohio

Akron Gamer:
New 'Call of Duty' could set entertainment record

Governor's veto stirs abortion critics

By John McCarthy
Associated Press writer

COLUMBUS: Gov. Ted Strickland's first showdown with the Legislature on abortion politics was an easy victory: A stroke of his veto pen allowed state spending on human cloning that the Legislature had voted to ban.

The result of Strickland's decision to nix the provision from an economic stimulus package, however, could reawaken abortion rights opponents who have been laying low.

Opposition to Strickland's veto was swift and loud.

State Sen. Steve Buehrer, a Delta Republican and sponsor of the ban, called it taxpayer-subsidized ''destruction of life.'' Tony Perkins, president of the abortion-opposing Family Research Council, said Strickland was ''violating the values of thousands of Ohio taxpayers.'' And Ohio Right to Life says it's considering taking the issue to the ballot.

The Legislature has been relatively quiet on abortion-related issues this session.

It passed a bill requiring doctors to offer women seeking abortions ultrasound images of their fetuses, but the women could say no. The bill was a watered down version of a more stringent federal measure that would have required women seeking abortions to look at the pictures. Ohio Right to Life characterized it as a compromise and NARAL-Ohio, which favors abortion rights, remained neutral.

Strickland, an abortion-rights backer, signed the bill in March.

In February 2007, Strickland had removed his name from the state's effort to defend a new law restricting the use of the abortion drug RU-486. The state went forward with its appeal of a ruling striking down the law and the Legislature remains a defendant, but the Democratic governor's action in the case drew little criticism.

Strickland also got a pass on a perennial proposal to ban abortions statewide, when House Speaker Jon Husted assigned it to the House Health Committee where it has disappeared from public view.

The abortion debate has quieted in part because Husted and Senate President Bill Harris have their focus on economic and budget issues — and two of the Legislature's staunchest abortion rights opponents, Sen. Jim Jordan and Rep. Ron Hood, are gone.

The issue has also lost much of its political fire.

The public is more concerned about such issues as the economy and the war in Iraq, said Corwin Smidt, a political science professor at Calvin College who specializes in religious issues.

''It is still an issue but it's much more under the radar because other issues have come to the forefront,'' Smidt said. ''It's not an issue we hear much about but continues to be an issue that people are concerned about.''

The shift was made clear when Sen. John McCain, the presumed Republican presidential nominee, rejected Ohio Pentecostal pastor Rod Parsley's endorsement because of controversial remarks he had made. Parsley's conservative religious message was an important factor in the 2004 and 2006 elections in the state.

McCain's decision came as liberal Evangelicals have sought to refocus the nation's values debate away from abortion and other hot-button social issues and toward fighting poverty, providing living wages, and other Democrat-favored issues.

Buehrer's amendment to the $1.5 billion job-creation package would have prohibited the state from allowing any of the money to be spent on human cloning activities. Strickland vetoed the provision because it would forbid spending on stem-cell research, a key area of the biomedical industry where the governor wants to develop jobs.

Anti-abortion activists oppose embryonic stem-cell research because it involves the destruction of embryos. The still-developing industry has become a new target for their ire.

As with abortion, it has taken some time for animosity over stem-cell research to develop between the proponents and opponents, Smidt said.

''It overlaps (with abortion). It's not a perfect match,'' Smidt said.

Buehrer has a separate bill banning human cloning outright, but the bill has been tabled for the time being.

That angers Mike Gonidakis, executive director of Ohio Right to Life. He said it's possible he will try to get a ban on the statewide ballot in 2010 — the year Strickland is up for re-election.

He wonders at the fact that the pivotal political issue of the past decade would have to take such a course: ''Is a ballot initiative necessary for the life movement?''

COLUMBUS: Gov. Ted Strickland's first showdown with the Legislature on abortion politics was an easy victory: A stroke of his veto pen allowed state spending on human cloning that the Legislature had voted to ban.

The result of Strickland's decision to nix the provision from an economic stimulus package, however, could reawaken abortion rights opponents who have been laying low.

Opposition to Strickland's veto was swift and loud.

State Sen. Steve Buehrer, a Delta Republican and sponsor of the ban, called it taxpayer-subsidized ''destruction of life.'' Tony Perkins, president of the abortion-opposing Family Research Council, said Strickland was ''violating the values of thousands of Ohio taxpayers.'' And Ohio Right to Life says it's considering taking the issue to the ballot.

The Legislature has been relatively quiet on abortion-related issues this session.

It passed a bill requiring doctors to offer women seeking abortions ultrasound images of their fetuses, but the women could say no. The bill was a watered down version of a more stringent federal measure that would have required women seeking abortions to look at the pictures. Ohio Right to Life characterized it as a compromise and NARAL-Ohio, which favors abortion rights, remained neutral.

Strickland, an abortion-rights backer, signed the bill in March.

In February 2007, Strickland had removed his name from the state's effort to defend a new law restricting the use of the abortion drug RU-486. The state went forward with its appeal of a ruling striking down the law and the Legislature remains a defendant, but the Democratic governor's action in the case drew little criticism.

Strickland also got a pass on a perennial proposal to ban abortions statewide, when House Speaker Jon Husted assigned it to the House Health Committee where it has disappeared from public view.

The abortion debate has quieted in part because Husted and Senate President Bill Harris have their focus on economic and budget issues — and two of the Legislature's staunchest abortion rights opponents, Sen. Jim Jordan and Rep. Ron Hood, are gone.

The issue has also lost much of its political fire.

The public is more concerned about such issues as the economy and the war in Iraq, said Corwin Smidt, a political science professor at Calvin College who specializes in religious issues.

''It is still an issue but it's much more under the radar because other issues have come to the forefront,'' Smidt said. ''It's not an issue we hear much about but continues to be an issue that people are concerned about.''

The shift was made clear when Sen. John McCain, the presumed Republican presidential nominee, rejected Ohio Pentecostal pastor Rod Parsley's endorsement because of controversial remarks he had made. Parsley's conservative religious message was an important factor in the 2004 and 2006 elections in the state.

McCain's decision came as liberal Evangelicals have sought to refocus the nation's values debate away from abortion and other hot-button social issues and toward fighting poverty, providing living wages, and other Democrat-favored issues.

Buehrer's amendment to the $1.5 billion job-creation package would have prohibited the state from allowing any of the money to be spent on human cloning activities. Strickland vetoed the provision because it would forbid spending on stem-cell research, a key area of the biomedical industry where the governor wants to develop jobs.

Anti-abortion activists oppose embryonic stem-cell research because it involves the destruction of embryos. The still-developing industry has become a new target for their ire.

As with abortion, it has taken some time for animosity over stem-cell research to develop between the proponents and opponents, Smidt said.

''It overlaps (with abortion). It's not a perfect match,'' Smidt said.

Buehrer has a separate bill banning human cloning outright, but the bill has been tabled for the time being.

That angers Mike Gonidakis, executive director of Ohio Right to Life. He said it's possible he will try to get a ban on the statewide ballot in 2010 — the year Strickland is up for re-election.

He wonders at the fact that the pivotal political issue of the past decade would have to take such a course: ''Is a ballot initiative necessary for the life movement?''



Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
















Most Commented Stories