Events Calendar
In This Section
Hispanic group sues Ohio over license plate policy
Hispanic group sues Ohio over license plate policy
Group says too many Cleveland City Council prayers said by Christian clergy
Report: Ohio agency discards recently bought items
Hospital probes alleged snooping into medical records of suspected Cleveland serial killer
Former Ohio doctor pleads guilty in drug case
Columbus Zoo's lion cubs ready for public stage
Court date slated for priest convicted in nun's murder
Most Read Stories
2 men shot during party in Fairlawn
Cancellation of Christmas not an option
Akron man killed in crash on his street
Akron Children's Hospital CEO, wife announce $1 million gift to support research
Victim of beating in Kent last week is declared dead at Akron hospital
Police: Pennsylvania man killed misbehaving puppy before Steelers game
Akron Circle K store robbed for second time this month
Several people hurt in Akron crash
KSU suspends basketball player
Police accuse bank robbery suspect of gobbling up note (with dashcam video)
Blogs:
Pets:
A Dog Named Christmas – Pet for the Holidays
The Heldenfiles:
Viewing Notes
Patrick McManamon:
Of pass interference and alleged "fake" injuries
Akron Zips:
No. 1 Akron to play Stanford next
Tribe Matters:
Seven players added to Tribe’s 40-man roster
Cleveland Browns:
Audio: Mangini disputes Poteat call, accuses Lions of faking injuries
Kent State Sports:
Flashes travel to Florida Atlantic
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs vs. Philadelphia 76ers
Buckeye Blogging:
Buckeye Football – Present and Future
Varsity Letters:
Gulley to visit Central Michigan in December
All Da King's Men:
The Onion, By Any Other Name…
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Glaring Contradictions
Akron Law Café:
Don't Try to Have Fun if you are Depressed
See Jane Style:
Vintage Chic
Car Chase:
What Automotive Thing Are You Thankful For?
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Faye Dunaway to be Evicted?
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Monique asks how to get tickets for the Polar Express.
Sound Check:
Steely Dan Plays "The Royal Scam" at E.J. Thomas Hall
HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why I am Glad I live in NEO
Akron Gamer:
Nintendo's Mario endures even as games come and go
By Joe Mandak
Associated Press
POSTED: 08:05 a.m. EDT, Jul 23, 2008
PITTSBURGH: The family of a girl who once asked Santa Claus for a wig to hide her baldness is suing FirstEnergy Generation Corp., saying its coal-fired power plant in Beaver County spewed pollution that caused the hair loss and other health problems.
The Bruce Mansfield plant in Shippingport has long been targeted by state and federal regulators, as well as environmental activists who have sued FirstEnergy, claiming the facility continues to violate Pennsylvania pollution standards.
The federal suit filed Monday by Michael and Jessica Hartle said their daughter, who was born in 2003, played daily in her grandparents' yard about a mile from the plant. They claim the girl suffers from thallium poisoning and exposure to other toxins, and has gastrointestinal and respiratory problems. She had lost all her body hair by December 2006.
Last year, the girl created a '''wish list' at school for Santa indicating thereon what she wanted most was a wig. No toys appeared on the Santa wish list,'' the lawsuit said. A wig was later donated to the family, according to the suit.
Mark Durbin, a spokesman for Akron, Ohio-based FirstEnergy, said Tuesday that the company's attorneys haven't had time to review the lawsuit.
The Hartles' claim centers on an incident that occurred July 22, 2006, when soot from the plant coated vehicles and more than 300 nearby homes, including the grandparents' house where the girl played outside that day.
The state Department of Environmental Protection fined FirstEnergy $25,000, the maximum allowed by state law, for the oily soot. Though sampling by the DEP and the company found elevated levels of arsenic, the state agency said no public health hazard occurred.
But the Hartles say FirstEnergy knew the soot contained potentially dangerous chemicals, even though it circulated a ''fact sheet'' to affected residents saying the soot ''is not a hazardous waste.''
The Hartles allowed their daughter to continue to play and sometimes eat her meals in the yard almost daily that summer and fall, ''given her parents' misinformed belief that the yard was safe.''
Attached to the lawsuit is another document from FirstEnergy in August 2006, recommending that residents not eat anything from their gardens for a year and not allow livestock to eat hay in fields covered with the soot.
The lawsuit contends tests showed thallium, mercury, arsenic and other materials were present in the soot ''in excess of accepted regulatory residential standards.''
The girl's doctors have recommended future medical tests on her kidneys, lungs and central nervous system to monitor her exposure to the ''toxic and hazardous materials,'' the suit said.
The environmental group PennFuture sued FirstEnergy last year, claiming the plant violated visible emissions standards at least 250 times between November 2002 and March 2007. FirstEnergy was already under a state consent decree to clean up the plant before that lawsuit was filed.
FirstEnergy has since asked the state for permission to install monitors in hopes of proving the pollution is not as bad as regulators and environmentalists say.
PITTSBURGH: The family of a girl who once asked Santa Claus for a wig to hide her baldness is suing FirstEnergy Generation Corp., saying its coal-fired power plant in Beaver County spewed pollution that caused the hair loss and other health problems.
The Bruce Mansfield plant in Shippingport has long been targeted by state and federal regulators, as well as environmental activists who have sued FirstEnergy, claiming the facility continues to violate Pennsylvania pollution standards.
The federal suit filed Monday by Michael and Jessica Hartle said their daughter, who was born in 2003, played daily in her grandparents' yard about a mile from the plant. They claim the girl suffers from thallium poisoning and exposure to other toxins, and has gastrointestinal and respiratory problems. She had lost all her body hair by December 2006.
Last year, the girl created a '''wish list' at school for Santa indicating thereon what she wanted most was a wig. No toys appeared on the Santa wish list,'' the lawsuit said. A wig was later donated to the family, according to the suit.
Mark Durbin, a spokesman for Akron, Ohio-based FirstEnergy, said Tuesday that the company's attorneys haven't had time to review the lawsuit.
The Hartles' claim centers on an incident that occurred July 22, 2006, when soot from the plant coated vehicles and more than 300 nearby homes, including the grandparents' house where the girl played outside that day.
The state Department of Environmental Protection fined FirstEnergy $25,000, the maximum allowed by state law, for the oily soot. Though sampling by the DEP and the company found elevated levels of arsenic, the state agency said no public health hazard occurred.
But the Hartles say FirstEnergy knew the soot contained potentially dangerous chemicals, even though it circulated a ''fact sheet'' to affected residents saying the soot ''is not a hazardous waste.''
The Hartles allowed their daughter to continue to play and sometimes eat her meals in the yard almost daily that summer and fall, ''given her parents' misinformed belief that the yard was safe.''
Attached to the lawsuit is another document from FirstEnergy in August 2006, recommending that residents not eat anything from their gardens for a year and not allow livestock to eat hay in fields covered with the soot.
The lawsuit contends tests showed thallium, mercury, arsenic and other materials were present in the soot ''in excess of accepted regulatory residential standards.''
The girl's doctors have recommended future medical tests on her kidneys, lungs and central nervous system to monitor her exposure to the ''toxic and hazardous materials,'' the suit said.
The environmental group PennFuture sued FirstEnergy last year, claiming the plant violated visible emissions standards at least 250 times between November 2002 and March 2007. FirstEnergy was already under a state consent decree to clean up the plant before that lawsuit was filed.
FirstEnergy has since asked the state for permission to install monitors in hopes of proving the pollution is not as bad as regulators and environmentalists say.
