Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Pets:
Sly children fool exercise study by using dogs

The Heldenfiles:
Friday Notebook

Patrick McManamon:
Dwayne Wade says no to Cleveland

Akron Zips:
Opponent outlook: Kent State

Browns Bulletin:
Quick thought on Browns rookies

Tribe Matters:
Now is no time to quit

Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth test showed marijuana

Kent State Sports:
Men's Basketball Scheduling update

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Andy’s Signed According to ESPN

All Da King's Men:
Baby Got Barack !

Blog of Mass Destruction:
As California Goes?

Akron Law Café:
Why do public officials violate Ohio Ethics Laws?

Varsity Letters:
Report: Ontko selects Wisconsin

See Jane Style:
Oh Baby!

Car Chase:
Where do We Go from Here?

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Closings….Not the Good Kind!

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Margy inquires-when is a Taste of Hudson?

Sound Check:
LeVert II live performance Saturday night — "Dedication" album due July 13,

HRLite House:
DDI One of Best Places to Work

Akron Gamer:
Video game sales drop in May

Obama takes South Carolina

Candidate wins majority of black votes, but faces challenges as he tries to reach across racial lines

By Steven Thomma
McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON: Democrats came away from South Carolina on Saturday torn between two top candidates — and deeply divided along racial lines that could pull at their party throughout a long and bruising campaign.

Illinois Sen. Barack Obama won the state. But he did it by winning an overwhelming majority of black votes while losing the majority of white votes — and getting a smaller share of the white vote than he had in any other state so far this year.

Together, those racial results suggest challenges ahead for Obama, who yearns to bridge racial divisions, particularly as the campaign goes coast to coast with Super Tuesday contests in 22 states on Feb. 5.

Former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards ran third in his native state, where he won the 2004 primary.

With 98 percent of South Carolina's precincts reporting, Obama had 55 percent of the vote to New York Sen. Hillary Clinton's 27 percent. Edwards had 18 percent. Exit polls showed Obama won almost every age, ideological and income group.

And that showing also points to a possible problem for Clinton, who failed to win many black votes despite the aggressive courting by her husband, a man so empathetic
he once was described by writer Toni Morrison as the ''first black president.''

Many Democrats complained that former President Bill Clinton was too harsh in his criticism of Obama, raising the possibility that some blacks could hold a grudge even if Hillary Clinton goes on to win the nomination.

''Racial politics were injected into this campaign in a way that was unnerving to me,'' said Rep. James Clyburn, D-S.C., the third-ranking Democrat in the U.S. House of Representatives and a major figure in black politics in South Carolina.

Obama's win keeps him neck and neck with Clinton for the nomination, each now with two state wins. He won Iowa and South Carolina; she won New Hampshire and Nevada.

Chances appear to be growing that their battle will continue until the August Democratic National Convention in Denver.

''I do not believe Super Tuesday will decide the nominee for our party,'' Clyburn said. ''I believe it will keep going through to the convention.''

Holding a firm base

If South Carolina is a sign of what's to come, the Clinton-Obama competition will be tough, perhaps even nasty, and driven perhaps as much by the race and gender of the voters as by the candidates' agendas.

Clinton and Obama each hold a firm base in the party, as illustrated by the results so far from four contests in all four regions of the country — Iowa in the Midwest, New Hampshire in the Northeast, Nevada in the West and South Carolina in the South.

Her base is women, whites, older people, blue-collar workers and firm Democrats.

His base is males, blacks, young people, upper-middle-class professionals and independents.

That gives Clinton an edge; women and whites are a much bigger slice of the party, and Democrats outnumber independents.

But Obama has shown an ability to break into her base, as he did in winning the women's vote in Iowa.

Winning white votes

The key to Obama's success is reaching across racial lines, avoiding being seen as a ''black candidate'' with limited appeal and winning white votes.

His share of the white vote remained roughly the same through contests in Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada, when he took 33 percent, 36 percent, and 34 percent, respectively.

In South Carolina, he took 24 percent of the white vote.

Clinton's share of the white vote grew at each step — 27 percent in Iowa, 39 percent in New Hampshire, 52 percent in Nevada. But it dropped in South Carolina to 38 percent, tied with former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards. If he drops out or is seen as no longer viable by most voters, it's unclear where his share of the vote would go.

Edwards now confronts the all-but-certain fact that he will not be the nominee.

His hope is to find enough cash to stay in the campaign and continue to win some delegates somewhere.

That could give him a bargaining chip should Obama and Clinton stay locked in such a close race that each falls short of the delegate majority needed to win the nomination. That might force them into a deal with Edwards to gain his delegates.

His dream: a deadlocked convention turns to him as an alternative.

WASHINGTON: Democrats came away from South Carolina on Saturday torn between two top candidates — and deeply divided along racial lines that could pull at their party throughout a long and bruising campaign.

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
















Most Commented Stories