Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Pets:
Not 101 Dalmations…but close!

The Heldenfiles:
Friday Notebook

Patrick McManamon:
Saturday entertainment, one more time …

Akron Zips:
No. 1 UA soccer remains perfect, Zips football defeats rival Flashes

Tribe Matters:
Tribe makes roster moves

Cleveland Browns:
Lewis doesn't like boycott

Kent State Sports:
Kent State falls to Akron, 20-28

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs at Knicks

Buckeye Blogging:
Weekly ‘B’ Deck Report – New Mexico St.

Varsity Letters:
Wrestling, bowling teams prepare for season

All Da King's Men:
Bigger And Better Boondoggles

Blog of Mass Destruction:
The Shooter

Akron Law Café:
NEW U.S. Supreme Court Database

See Jane Style:
Muffle Your Muffler

Car Chase:
Perfect Weather for an Autumn Drive

Let's Talk Real Estate:
RUMORS: Downtown Restaurant Explosion

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jack is looking for a trip to Southern Ohio the week of November 16.

Sound Check:
The Black Keys to perform benefit concert at Musica on November 27

HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why People Do Not Live in Northeast Ohio

Akron Gamer:
New 'Call of Duty' could set entertainment record

CEO pay up in '07 despite lagging economy

Median salary package hits about $8.4 million

By Rachel Beck
and Matthew Fordahl
Associated Press

NEW YORK: As the American economy slowed to a crawl and stockholders watched their money evaporate, pay for chief executives chugged to even dizzier heights last year, an Associated Press analysis shows.

The AP review of compensation for the heads of companies in the Standard & Poor's 500 index finds the median pay package added up to nearly $8.4 million. That's a gain of about $280,000 from 2006.

The 31/2 percent pay increase for CEOs came even as the landscape for both workers and shareholders darkened considerably and the economy was choked by a housing market in free fall, layoffs and rising prices for fuel and food.

At the top of the AP list: John Thain, who took the reins of Merrill Lynch on Dec. 1.

His $83 million pay package was supercharged by a signing bonus and other enticements that lured him from the New York Stock Exchange to lead the investment bank as it was suffering its worst losses ever.

Collectively, the 10 best-paid executive made more than half a billion dollars last year. Yet half the members of this soaring club were leading companies whose profits shrank dramatically.

The AP examination of chief executive pay in 2007 mined data from the 410 companies in the S&P 500 that filed compensation disclosures with federal regulators in the
first six months of this year.

The AP's formula, based on data from the past two years, adds up salary, perks, bonuses, above-market interest on pay set aside for later, and company estimates for the value of stock options and stock awards on the day they were granted last year.

That provides a clearer picture than pay totals required by the Securities and Exchange Commission, compensation experts say, because the SEC totals include expenses companies book during the year for previously granted stock compensation and retirement benefits.

Pay for performance

The value of stock and options given to chief executive may turn out to be significantly higher or lower if they are ultimately cashed out, but the numbers in the AP formula do reflect the board of directors' estimate of the likely eventual payout.

The median salary figure of about $8.4 million means half the executive in the AP analysis made more than that and half made less.

There were some signs companies were pulling back on pay at the top: Out of the 316 companies in the AP survey that had the same chief executive two years running, about two-fifths lowered the total pay package. However, the primary culprit for some was falling stock prices that cut into the value of the shares included in pay packages.

In many more cases, overall pay ballooned. Rick Wagoner, chief executive of General Motors Corp., announced this month the company had to close four plants that make trucks and SUVs because of lagging demand as fuel prices soar. That followed the posting of a $39 billion loss in 2007, a year when its stock price fell by about 19 percent, without adjusting for dividends.

And Wagoner? His pay rose 64 percent, to $15.7 million.

Last year was rocky for the economy and the stock market, making it a useful test of a concept called pay for performance — a term companies use to sell shareholders on the idea chief executives are being paid based on how well the company does.

According to this concept, used frequently by the compensation committees of corporate boards in their proxy statements, a big chunk of executive pay is considered ''at risk,'' meaning it could disappear if executives don't meet established goals.

But the AP analysis found that their pay rose and fell regardless of the direction of a company's stock price or profits.

No profit, no problem

Take KB Home, battered by the subprime lending crisis and the weak housing market. According to the Los Angeles home builder's proxy statement, Chief Executive Jeffrey Mezger is entitled to a cash bonus based on a percentage of KB's profit.

The problem was, there was no profit. KB Home lost almost $930 million in 2007 and its stock lost 60 percent of its value. But Mezger still made $24.4 million, as valued by the AP, including a $6 million cash bonus.

He pocketed that bonus because he exceeded certain objectives the board had set out for him. Among them were improving performance on a customer satisfaction survey and developing senior leadership in his first year as chief executive.

''Compensation has become a shell game,'' said Richard Ferlauto, director of pension and benefits policy for the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, a labor group representing government workers.

Pay packages were somewhat smaller in the financial industry last year — banks, investment firms, mortgage companies, insurers and other institutions all were roiled by the subprime lending disaster.

For companies in the financial sector that had the same chief executive two years in a row, median pay dropped 41/4 percent to $8.7 million in 2007. But that was still a smaller decline than the 6 percent drop in earnings and 15 percent slump in stock prices before dividend adjustments, according to Standard & Poor's Capital IQ data service.

NEW YORK: As the American economy slowed to a crawl and stockholders watched their money evaporate, pay for chief executives chugged to even dizzier heights last year, an Associated Press analysis shows.

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
















Most Commented Stories