Container Top
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


First Bell - On Education:
No City of Akron basketball tonight

Pets:
Pet telethon re-airs

The Heldenfiles:
Chipmunks "Squeakquel" on DVD/BD March 30

Akron Zips:
Late surge gives Zips ugly road win

Tribe Matters:
Blogmail response on Hafner

Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth's contract terminated

Balanced Ledger:
QB in Browns future: another mock draft

Kent State Sports:
KSU Notes – February 9

Cleveland Cavaliers:
NBA Power Rankings from Around the Internet

Buckeye Blogging:
Buckeyes grab 18 players on signing day

Varsity Letters:
Garfield at Buchtel basketball

All Da King's Men:
Palin At The Tea Party Convention

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Republican Pre-Conditions

Akron Law Café:
Citizens United v. F.E.C. (Part 4): Kennedy's and O'Connor's Basic Approaches to Constitutional Decisionmaking – Top Down and Bottom Up

Car Chase:
Collector Car Hobby Loses One of the Best—Jim Roll

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Decisions Decisions: Credit Cards or Your Mortgage?

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Loucile is looking for a Lake Erie getaway in June for three kids, ages 1, 3, and 5.

Sound Check:
Talk of the Town – Top entertainment picks for the weekend

HRLite House:
Track HR Research

Akron Gamer:
Makers of 'Castle Crashers' unveil 'BattleBlock Theater'

See Jane Style:
Do IT this week: Layering

Judge dismisses lawsuit against Diebold

Shareholders charged investors were misled

By Jim Mackinnon
Beacon Journal business writer

A federal judge dismissed a class-action lawsuit filed in 2005 against ATM and voting machine maker Diebold Inc. of Green, saying that shareholders failed to prove the company lied about its financial health and misled investors.

Five shareholder lawsuits were filed in late 2005 against Diebold and some current and former officers and directors, alleging federal securities laws were violated, the company said in a short statement.

The suits contended in part that executives misled shareholders about problems with the company's electronic voting machines, and that the company schemed to recognize revenue prematurely in violation of generally accepted accounting procedures and its own accounting procedures.

Shares fell 50 cents to $39.15. Shares are up 38.2 percent, including reinvested dividends, since Jan. 1 and are down 8.1 percent from a year ago.


Diebold on Sept. 21, 2005, lowered its earnings guidance for the third quarter and fiscal year. The news sent share prices tumbling, with shareholders filing related lawsuits shortly afterward.

The cases were consolidated into a single class-action suit in U.S. District Court in Akron. Judge Peter Economus on Aug. 22 granted the company's motion to dismiss the consolidated cases.

Diebold issued a statement saying a separate class-action suit remains against the company and some of its current and former officers and directors. The remaining suit was filed by participants in the company's 401(k) plan and alleges breaches of duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, the company said.


Jim Mackinnon can be reached at 330-996-3544 or jmackinnon@thebeaconjournal.com.

A federal judge dismissed a class-action lawsuit filed in 2005 against ATM and voting machine maker Diebold Inc. of Green, saying that shareholders failed to prove the company lied about its financial health and misled investors.

Get the full article here.



Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button














Most Commented Stories