Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Tallmadge man dies after motorcycle crash
Passers-by call police over topless gardener
Man on leave from Iraq war slain in Akron
Soldier on leave dies after shooting near UA
Man breaks into house, flees when owner wakes up
Slow starts might hurt Cavs' big finish
Teen accused of drinking, dancing topless in club
Quinn tells Denver his foot has healed
Blogs:
Akron Docs in Haiti:
Almost home
First Bell - On Education:
21st Century Skills and Akron’s new middle school
Pets:
Lost Mini Schnauzer around Cascade Valley Park
The Heldenfiles:
Fess Parker, R.I.P.
Akron Zips:
Looking back on the season
Tribe Matters:
Seven prospects reassigned to minor-league camp
Cleveland Browns:
Yates latest to re-sign
Balanced Ledger:
How times have changed?
Kent State Sports:
Kent State gears up for WNIT at Michigan
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs at Chicago Bulls (Green Mascot and All)
Buckeye Blogging:
Bucks High Seed – Turner High Praise
Varsity Letters:
Report: Ohio offers Olack
All Da King's Men:
ObamaCare To Reduce Premiums By 3000% ?
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Pathetic GOP Nullification Attempts
Akron Law Café:
More on Shaming Corporate Criminals
Car Chase:
2010 CONCOURS SEASON IS UPON US
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Deals in Miami?!.
Sound Check:
Willie Nelson & Family coming to the Akron Civic Theatre May 11
See Jane Style:
Who Wore What – The Oscars
HRLite House:
Horses of Courses
Akron Gamer:
Video: Gamers expected to 'reach' for new 'Halo'
Members argue that they object only to selling sewers to fund plan; competing issues on ballot
By Carl Chancellor
Beacon Journal staff writer
Published on Friday, Oct 31, 2008
On Thursday, more than eight months after this group gathered to share concerns about the sale and or lease of the Akron sewer system, it came together again at East Akron Community House, this time to clear up what members believe is a misconception.
''We've never been against funding scholarships. We're against the privatization of our sewer system,'' said Cathy Gordon, who sat at a table with a dozen other members of Citizens to Save Our Sewers and Water (SOS). Many around the table wore SOS' signature neon green T-shirts with a water faucet on the front.
Weeks after Mayor Don Plusquellic proposed funding a scholarship plan for Akron students by leveraging the value of the city sewers, SOS was formed to stop a sale or lease of the sewers.
The group collected nearly 4,000 signatures on petitions to place Issue 9, which requires voter approval to sell or lease a city-owned utility, on the ballot.
Partly as a response to the SOS initiative, Plusquellic placed his scholarship plan Issue 8 on the November ballot as well.
Willie Smith, SOS president, said that Issue 9 ''protects the citizens of Akron from hasty political decision making'' and enables city voters to decide the fate of the sewers and other public utilities.
Smith said Issue 9 will give the mayor and City Council the time ''to further study'' the scholarship proposal.
''This thing needs to be well thought out,'' said Smith, who said the mayor's scholarship plan was ''rushed.'' He then offered the services of SOS in helping the city formulate a scholarship plan that doesn't require the lease of a citizen-owned asset like the sewers.
Plusquellic has not been shy in questioning the motives of SOS. On more than one occasion, he has called SOS ''a group of naysayers'' with ''no principles or morals'' that wants to make the city look bad.
Mark Williamson, speaking on behalf of the mayor, said, ''If they are against Issue 8, they are against scholarships.''
The bottom line, Smith said, is that Issue 9 ''restores democracy for Akron citizens.''
Gordon opened a booklet and read a quote from Tom Johnson, the fabled Cleveland mayor who served in the early 1900s: ''I believe in the municipal ownership of all public service monopolies . . . for if you do not own them, they will, in time, own you.''
Closing the booklet, Gordon recalled an observation often made by her husband: ''He always says our sewers are doing exactly what they were meant to do.''
Carl Chancellor can be reached at 330-996-3725 or cchancellor@thebeaconjournal.com.
On Thursday, more than eight months after this group gathered to share concerns about the sale and or lease of the Akron sewer system, it came together again at East Akron Community House, this time to clear up what members believe is a misconception.
Get the full article here.
Akron's city hall hero needs to realize that any group of citizens in Akron, are jes' that, citizens of Akron, therefore taxpayers.
Taxpayers have a voice in their government. These folks have chosen to use their voices.
Akron's city hall hero has chosen to belittle them, instead of applaudin' their moxie, while tryin' to show justification for his cause.
I agree with Beta. As taxpayers the SOS group does have a voice. I signed the SOS petition for the mere fact I belive the Mayor did not put a whole lot of thought into the matter.
I resent Mark Williamson assuming that if one votes against Issue 8 they are against scholarships. I'm for scholarships but let's figure out a better way of funding them. Personally, I'm tired of the Mayor and his "my way or the highway" attitude.
"No principals or morals". This, coming from Don?
The voice of experience, I suppose.
Scholarships for Akron students would be amazing. But, the particular scholarship programs our misleading mayor keeps referring to, including the Kalamazoo Promise, were funded by private donors, not the auctioning off of a public utility, or any other city-wide compromise.
Was Mark Williamson the scholarship prototype? He seems to be bound to Akron by some unseen force! Mark, are you just mad because you have to serve out your 30 year prison term in Akron as Don's towel boy?
This may not be the solution, but NE Ohio needs to get serious about training its wokers if NE Ohio wants to turn its economy around.
Vote NO on Issue 8.
Why won't "the Donald" try another way to fund the Scholarship Plan? He has caused so much commotion and spent so much money to get this approved by the voters, it would seem that it would be easier to fund it differently and get his plan moving, rather than cause so much desention with the citizens of Akron. He is supposed to be running the City of Akron FOR THE PEOPLE AND BY THE PEOPLE!
He does not have the right to sell our utility (sewer and water system) at his whim to fund anything! Who does he think he is?
As taxpayers, we pay for this utility.
Remember, Akron Citizens . . . "Hate 8 but 9 is Fine!" Get out there and vote so the Mayor cannot do this again to our democratic system.
