Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Pets:
Sly children fool exercise study by using dogs

The Heldenfiles:
Friday Notebook

Patrick McManamon:
Dwayne Wade says no to Cleveland

Akron Zips:
Opponent outlook: Kent State

Browns Bulletin:
Quick thought on Browns rookies

Tribe Matters:
Now is no time to quit

Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth test showed marijuana

Kent State Sports:
Men's Basketball Scheduling update

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Andy’s Signed According to ESPN

All Da King's Men:
Baby Got Barack !

Blog of Mass Destruction:
As California Goes?

Akron Law Café:
Why do public officials violate Ohio Ethics Laws?

Varsity Letters:
Report: Ontko selects Wisconsin

See Jane Style:
Oh Baby!

Car Chase:
Where do We Go from Here?

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Closings….Not the Good Kind!

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Margy inquires-when is a Taste of Hudson?

Sound Check:
LeVert II live performance Saturday night — "Dedication" album due July 13,

HRLite House:
DDI One of Best Places to Work

Akron Gamer:
Video game sales drop in May

NATO agrees on Afghan drug role for military

By Paul Ames
Associated Press

BUDAPEST, HUNGARY: NATO defense ministers today authorized their troops in Afghanistan to attack drug barons blamed for pumping up to $100 million a year into the coffers of resurgent Taliban fighters.

''With regard to counter-narcotics . . . ISAF can act in concert with the Afghans against facilities and facilitators supporting the insurgency,'' said NATO spokesman James Appathurai, referring to the NATO force.

The United States has pushed for NATO's 50,000 troops to take on a counter-narcotics role to hit back at the Taliban, whose increasing attacks have cast doubt on the prospects of a Western military victory in Afghanistan.

However, Germany, Spain and others were wary and their doubts led to NATO imposing conditions on the anti-drug mandate for the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force.

Troops will only be able to act against drug facilities if authorized by their own governments; only drug producers deemed to be supporting the insurgency will be targeted; and the operation must be designed to be temporary — lasting only until the Afghan security forces are deemed able to take on the task.

NATO defense ministers will review the success of the mission when they meet next February in Poland. Despite the limitations, NATO's top commander said the agreement gave him sufficient authority to act against the Taliban's drug lord backers.

''We now have the ability to move forward in an area that affects the security and stability of Afghanistan,'' said U.S. Gen. John Craddock. ''It will allow us to reduce the funding and income to the insurgents.''

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who pressed for the anti-drug effort, welcomed the NATO deal.

He said the Unites States and the British are interested in attacking the drug problem, along with some others whom he did not name.

Since the bulk of the drug problems are in the southern part of the country, he said it is likely troops there will be more willing interdict drugs than those in other locations.

The split is not unusual, since some countries already limit the use of their troops in Afghanistan, based on what are called caveats. The restriction include how, where or when some troops will fight.

Germany and Spain agreed to the anti-drug mission after an appeal for help from Afghanistan's defense minister.

''We've asked NATO to please support us, support our effort in destroying the labs and also the interdiction of the drugs and the chemical precursors that are coming from outside the country for making heroin,'' Gen. Abdul Rahim Wardak told reporters after meeting his NATO counterparts Thursday.

Afghanistan supplies 90 percent of the world's heroin, a trade worth billions of dollars.

Until now, responsibility for dealing with the problem has lain with the Afghan police, but NATO commanders believe the fledgling force cannot cope with the problem. They say the time has come for NATO to move against the drug barons.

To start, at least, the operation will focus in the southern region of Afghanistan, where NATO officials say drug production is concentrated.

Some allies were concerned that a counter-narcotics campaign could spark a backlash against their troops, even if, as NATO commanders insist, the campaign will not target farmers who depend on growing opium poppies for a living.

They also feared that widening the mission could over-stretch the hard-pressed troops and undermine NATO's long-term goal of handing more responsibility to Afghan forces. However, German Defense Minister Franz Josef Jung said he was pleased with the compromise.

''We have to stop the financing of terrorism with drugs,'' he told reporters.


Associated Press writers Barbara Schaeder, Pablo Gorondi and Lolita C. Baldor contributed to this report.

BUDAPEST, HUNGARY: NATO defense ministers today authorized their troops in Afghanistan to attack drug barons blamed for pumping up to $100 million a year into the coffers of resurgent Taliban fighters.

''With regard to counter-narcotics . . . ISAF can act in concert with the Afghans against facilities and facilitators supporting the insurgency,'' said NATO spokesman James Appathurai, referring to the NATO force.

The United States has pushed for NATO's 50,000 troops to take on a counter-narcotics role to hit back at the Taliban, whose increasing attacks have cast doubt on the prospects of a Western military victory in Afghanistan.

However, Germany, Spain and others were wary and their doubts led to NATO imposing conditions on the anti-drug mandate for the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force.

Troops will only be able to act against drug facilities if authorized by their own governments; only drug producers deemed to be supporting the insurgency will be targeted; and the operation must be designed to be temporary — lasting only until the Afghan security forces are deemed able to take on the task.

NATO defense ministers will review the success of the mission when they meet next February in Poland. Despite the limitations, NATO's top commander said the agreement gave him sufficient authority to act against the Taliban's drug lord backers.

''We now have the ability to move forward in an area that affects the security and stability of Afghanistan,'' said U.S. Gen. John Craddock. ''It will allow us to reduce the funding and income to the insurgents.''

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who pressed for the anti-drug effort, welcomed the NATO deal.

He said the Unites States and the British are interested in attacking the drug problem, along with some others whom he did not name.

Since the bulk of the drug problems are in the southern part of the country, he said it is likely troops there will be more willing interdict drugs than those in other locations.

The split is not unusual, since some countries already limit the use of their troops in Afghanistan, based on what are called caveats. The restriction include how, where or when some troops will fight.

Germany and Spain agreed to the anti-drug mission after an appeal for help from Afghanistan's defense minister.

''We've asked NATO to please support us, support our effort in destroying the labs and also the interdiction of the drugs and the chemical precursors that are coming from outside the country for making heroin,'' Gen. Abdul Rahim Wardak told reporters after meeting his NATO counterparts Thursday.

Afghanistan supplies 90 percent of the world's heroin, a trade worth billions of dollars.

Until now, responsibility for dealing with the problem has lain with the Afghan police, but NATO commanders believe the fledgling force cannot cope with the problem. They say the time has come for NATO to move against the drug barons.

To start, at least, the operation will focus in the southern region of Afghanistan, where NATO officials say drug production is concentrated.

Some allies were concerned that a counter-narcotics campaign could spark a backlash against their troops, even if, as NATO commanders insist, the campaign will not target farmers who depend on growing opium poppies for a living.

They also feared that widening the mission could over-stretch the hard-pressed troops and undermine NATO's long-term goal of handing more responsibility to Afghan forces. However, German Defense Minister Franz Josef Jung said he was pleased with the compromise.

''We have to stop the financing of terrorism with drugs,'' he told reporters.


Associated Press writers Barbara Schaeder, Pablo Gorondi and Lolita C. Baldor contributed to this report.



Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button


JUSTANOBSERVER
AKRON, OH

Posted 03:17 PM, 10/10/2008

THIS HAS A FAMILIAR RING TO IT. TARGETING DRUG CARTELS - NOT ALL - JUST SELECTED ONES. AND JUST UNTIL THE AFGHANS CAN GET THEIR COLLECTIVE ACT TOGETHER. BUT - HEY - WAIT A MINUTE - AFGHANISTAN PRODUCES 90% OF THE WORLD'S HEROIN - SO THIS IS HARDLY A FLY-BY-NIGHT OPERATION. NOW - ALL OF A SUDDEN WE'RE GOING TO MOVE IN, TAKE OUT SELECTED TARGETS, AND CALL IT A DAY. HOPING, OF COURSE, THE TALABAN RUNS OUT OF OPERATING FUNDS AND STRUGGLES TO OPERATE. THE DRUG PROBLEM IN THE UNITED STATES IS MUCH, PERMIT ME TO REPEAT, MUCH, MORE SERIOUS DELIMMA. IF WE CAN'T SOLVE THIS PROBLEM FOR OURSELVES, WHO THE HECK ARE WE TO PRESUME TO HAVE THE EXPERTISE TO UNDERTAKE THIS FOR ANOTHER. TO STOP THE DRUGS, YOU HAVE TO KILL THE CROPS. IN ADDITION, YOU HAVE TO MAKE A STATEMENT OF INTLOERANCE FOR DRUGS. SUPPOSE, FOR EXAMPLE, SUMMARILY KILLING THOSE FOUND WITH DISTRIBUTION QUANTITIES OF DRUGS. USERS GET REHAB - ONCE - THEN TIME. YEAH SURE - LET'S FIX FRIGGEN' AFGHANISTAN.
















Most Commented Stories