Events Calendar
In This Section
Scientists say new dinosaur species found in South Africa
Vatican turns toward the heavens
H1N1 flu is springboard for sick leave
North, South Korea fight at sea before Obama visit
Mexican clergy seek global help as violence grows
Suicide car bomb kills 24 in northwest Pakistan
Brazil college backs down on mini-dress expulsion
Most Read Stories
Chapel Hill isn't rolling right along
Akron City Council OKs higher speed on I-77
Suitcase causes bomb scare at Akron bus terminal
New eateries expand menu of options
Patrick McManamon: Here's what the Browns should try the rest of the season
Man says he was punched, robbed by 3 people in parking lot
Motorcyclist killed, wife injured in Stark County crash
Stark County engineer dies at 49
Blogs:
Pets:
First Person: Inside St. Louis Pit Bull Shelter
The Heldenfiles:
Tuesday Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
An interesting thought from a reader
Akron Zips:
Akron vs. Mount Union — Liveblog
Tribe Matters:
Indians announce spring dates
Cleveland Browns:
Mangini doesn't name a quarterback
Kent State Sports:
Flashes interested in another Cincinnati player
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Cavs: Yeah, on That Issue of Privacy
Buckeye Blogging:
Buckeyes Roll 100-60 / Season Outlook
Varsity Letters:
Twinsburg likes chances, but warns offense needs to deliver
All Da King's Men:
More On The Fort Hood Jihadist
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Simply Incapable of Telling The Truth
Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (63) Commonwealth Fund Report on Primary Care
See Jane Style:
Muffle Your Muffler
Car Chase:
Clock Tender- Extending the Life of Collector Car Clocks
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Rumors: Akron Starbucks Closing
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jack is looking for a trip to Southern Ohio the week of November 16.
Sound Check:
Aeromsith looking for new singer as Steven Tyler contemplates solo career
HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why People Do Not Live in Northeast Ohio
Akron Gamer:
Video: 'Modern Warfare 2' hits the streets
By Paul Ames
Associated Press
POSTED: 02:52 p.m. EDT, Oct 10, 2008
BUDAPEST, HUNGARY: NATO defense ministers today authorized their troops in Afghanistan to attack drug barons blamed for pumping up to $100 million a year into the coffers of resurgent Taliban fighters.
''With regard to counter-narcotics . . . ISAF can act in concert with the Afghans against facilities and facilitators supporting the insurgency,'' said NATO spokesman James Appathurai, referring to the NATO force.
The United States has pushed for NATO's 50,000 troops to take on a counter-narcotics role to hit back at the Taliban, whose increasing attacks have cast doubt on the prospects of a Western military victory in Afghanistan.
However, Germany, Spain and others were wary and their doubts led to NATO imposing conditions on the anti-drug mandate for the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force.
Troops will only be able to act against drug facilities if authorized by their own governments; only drug producers deemed to be supporting the insurgency will be targeted; and the operation must be designed to be temporary — lasting only until the Afghan security forces are deemed able to take on the task.
NATO defense ministers will review the success of the mission when they meet next February in Poland. Despite the limitations, NATO's top commander said the agreement gave him sufficient authority to act against the Taliban's drug lord backers.
''We now have the ability to move forward in an area that affects the security and stability of Afghanistan,'' said U.S. Gen. John Craddock. ''It will allow us to reduce the funding and income to the insurgents.''
U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who pressed for the anti-drug effort, welcomed the NATO deal.
He said the Unites States and the British are interested in attacking the drug problem, along with some others whom he did not name.
Since the bulk of the drug problems are in the southern part of the country, he said it is likely troops there will be more willing interdict drugs than those in other locations.
The split is not unusual, since some countries already limit the use of their troops in Afghanistan, based on what are called caveats. The restriction include how, where or when some troops will fight.
Germany and Spain agreed to the anti-drug mission after an appeal for help from Afghanistan's defense minister.
''We've asked NATO to please support us, support our effort in destroying the labs and also the interdiction of the drugs and the chemical precursors that are coming from outside the country for making heroin,'' Gen. Abdul Rahim Wardak told reporters after meeting his NATO counterparts Thursday.
Afghanistan supplies 90 percent of the world's heroin, a trade worth billions of dollars.
Until now, responsibility for dealing with the problem has lain with the Afghan police, but NATO commanders believe the fledgling force cannot cope with the problem. They say the time has come for NATO to move against the drug barons.
To start, at least, the operation will focus in the southern region of Afghanistan, where NATO officials say drug production is concentrated.
Some allies were concerned that a counter-narcotics campaign could spark a backlash against their troops, even if, as NATO commanders insist, the campaign will not target farmers who depend on growing opium poppies for a living.
They also feared that widening the mission could over-stretch the hard-pressed troops and undermine NATO's long-term goal of handing more responsibility to Afghan forces. However, German Defense Minister Franz Josef Jung said he was pleased with the compromise.
''We have to stop the financing of terrorism with drugs,'' he told reporters.
Associated Press writers Barbara Schaeder, Pablo Gorondi and Lolita C. Baldor contributed to this report.
BUDAPEST, HUNGARY: NATO defense ministers today authorized their troops in Afghanistan to attack drug barons blamed for pumping up to $100 million a year into the coffers of resurgent Taliban fighters.
''With regard to counter-narcotics . . . ISAF can act in concert with the Afghans against facilities and facilitators supporting the insurgency,'' said NATO spokesman James Appathurai, referring to the NATO force.
The United States has pushed for NATO's 50,000 troops to take on a counter-narcotics role to hit back at the Taliban, whose increasing attacks have cast doubt on the prospects of a Western military victory in Afghanistan.
However, Germany, Spain and others were wary and their doubts led to NATO imposing conditions on the anti-drug mandate for the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force.
Troops will only be able to act against drug facilities if authorized by their own governments; only drug producers deemed to be supporting the insurgency will be targeted; and the operation must be designed to be temporary — lasting only until the Afghan security forces are deemed able to take on the task.
NATO defense ministers will review the success of the mission when they meet next February in Poland. Despite the limitations, NATO's top commander said the agreement gave him sufficient authority to act against the Taliban's drug lord backers.
''We now have the ability to move forward in an area that affects the security and stability of Afghanistan,'' said U.S. Gen. John Craddock. ''It will allow us to reduce the funding and income to the insurgents.''
U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who pressed for the anti-drug effort, welcomed the NATO deal.
He said the Unites States and the British are interested in attacking the drug problem, along with some others whom he did not name.
Since the bulk of the drug problems are in the southern part of the country, he said it is likely troops there will be more willing interdict drugs than those in other locations.
The split is not unusual, since some countries already limit the use of their troops in Afghanistan, based on what are called caveats. The restriction include how, where or when some troops will fight.
Germany and Spain agreed to the anti-drug mission after an appeal for help from Afghanistan's defense minister.
''We've asked NATO to please support us, support our effort in destroying the labs and also the interdiction of the drugs and the chemical precursors that are coming from outside the country for making heroin,'' Gen. Abdul Rahim Wardak told reporters after meeting his NATO counterparts Thursday.
Afghanistan supplies 90 percent of the world's heroin, a trade worth billions of dollars.
Until now, responsibility for dealing with the problem has lain with the Afghan police, but NATO commanders believe the fledgling force cannot cope with the problem. They say the time has come for NATO to move against the drug barons.
To start, at least, the operation will focus in the southern region of Afghanistan, where NATO officials say drug production is concentrated.
Some allies were concerned that a counter-narcotics campaign could spark a backlash against their troops, even if, as NATO commanders insist, the campaign will not target farmers who depend on growing opium poppies for a living.
They also feared that widening the mission could over-stretch the hard-pressed troops and undermine NATO's long-term goal of handing more responsibility to Afghan forces. However, German Defense Minister Franz Josef Jung said he was pleased with the compromise.
''We have to stop the financing of terrorism with drugs,'' he told reporters.
Associated Press writers Barbara Schaeder, Pablo Gorondi and Lolita C. Baldor contributed to this report.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
AKRON, OH
Posted 03:17 PM, 10/10/2008
THIS HAS A FAMILIAR RING TO IT. TARGETING DRUG CARTELS - NOT ALL - JUST SELECTED ONES. AND JUST UNTIL THE AFGHANS CAN GET THEIR COLLECTIVE ACT TOGETHER. BUT - HEY - WAIT A MINUTE - AFGHANISTAN PRODUCES 90% OF THE WORLD'S HEROIN - SO THIS IS HARDLY A FLY-BY-NIGHT OPERATION. NOW - ALL OF A SUDDEN WE'RE GOING TO MOVE IN, TAKE OUT SELECTED TARGETS, AND CALL IT A DAY. HOPING, OF COURSE, THE TALABAN RUNS OUT OF OPERATING FUNDS AND STRUGGLES TO OPERATE. THE DRUG PROBLEM IN THE UNITED STATES IS MUCH, PERMIT ME TO REPEAT, MUCH, MORE SERIOUS DELIMMA. IF WE CAN'T SOLVE THIS PROBLEM FOR OURSELVES, WHO THE HECK ARE WE TO PRESUME TO HAVE THE EXPERTISE TO UNDERTAKE THIS FOR ANOTHER. TO STOP THE DRUGS, YOU HAVE TO KILL THE CROPS. IN ADDITION, YOU HAVE TO MAKE A STATEMENT OF INTLOERANCE FOR DRUGS. SUPPOSE, FOR EXAMPLE, SUMMARILY KILLING THOSE FOUND WITH DISTRIBUTION QUANTITIES OF DRUGS. USERS GET REHAB - ONCE - THEN TIME. YEAH SURE - LET'S FIX FRIGGEN' AFGHANISTAN.
