Events Calendar
In This Section
Icebergs head from Antarctica for New Zealand
Furry felons rob South African tourists, steal food
China executes 2 for role in tainted milk scandal
Small batch of swine flu vaccines pulled in Canada
Belgian expert looks at other questionable comas
Iran said ready for uranium exchange on its soil
200,000 animals to be sacrificed at Nepal festival
Philippines declares emergency after 46 killed
Most Read Stories
2 men shot during party in Fairlawn
Cancellation of Christmas not an option
Akron man killed in crash on his street
Akron Children's Hospital CEO, wife announce $1 million gift to support research
Victim of beating in Kent last week is declared dead at Akron hospital
Police: Pennsylvania man killed misbehaving puppy before Steelers game
Akron Circle K store robbed for second time this month
Several people hurt in Akron crash
KSU suspends basketball player
Police accuse bank robbery suspect of gobbling up note (with dashcam video)
Blogs:
Pets:
A Dog Named Christmas – Pet for the Holidays
The Heldenfiles:
Viewing Notes
Patrick McManamon:
Of pass interference and alleged "fake" injuries
Akron Zips:
No. 1 Akron to play Stanford next
Tribe Matters:
Seven players added to Tribe’s 40-man roster
Cleveland Browns:
Audio: Mangini disputes Poteat call, accuses Lions of faking injuries
Kent State Sports:
Flashes travel to Florida Atlantic
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs vs. Philadelphia 76ers
Buckeye Blogging:
Buckeye Football – Present and Future
Varsity Letters:
Gulley to visit Central Michigan in December
All Da King's Men:
The Onion, By Any Other Name…
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Glaring Contradictions
Akron Law Café:
Don't Try to Have Fun if you are Depressed
See Jane Style:
Vintage Chic
Car Chase:
What Automotive Thing Are You Thankful For?
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Faye Dunaway to be Evicted?
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Monique asks how to get tickets for the Polar Express.
Sound Check:
Steely Dan Plays "The Royal Scam" at E.J. Thomas Hall
HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why I am Glad I live in NEO
Akron Gamer:
Nintendo's Mario endures even as games come and go
By Paul Ames
Associated Press
POSTED: 02:52 p.m. EDT, Oct 10, 2008
BUDAPEST, HUNGARY: NATO defense ministers today authorized their troops in Afghanistan to attack drug barons blamed for pumping up to $100 million a year into the coffers of resurgent Taliban fighters.
''With regard to counter-narcotics . . . ISAF can act in concert with the Afghans against facilities and facilitators supporting the insurgency,'' said NATO spokesman James Appathurai, referring to the NATO force.
The United States has pushed for NATO's 50,000 troops to take on a counter-narcotics role to hit back at the Taliban, whose increasing attacks have cast doubt on the prospects of a Western military victory in Afghanistan.
However, Germany, Spain and others were wary and their doubts led to NATO imposing conditions on the anti-drug mandate for the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force.
Troops will only be able to act against drug facilities if authorized by their own governments; only drug producers deemed to be supporting the insurgency will be targeted; and the operation must be designed to be temporary — lasting only until the Afghan security forces are deemed able to take on the task.
NATO defense ministers will review the success of the mission when they meet next February in Poland. Despite the limitations, NATO's top commander said the agreement gave him sufficient authority to act against the Taliban's drug lord backers.
''We now have the ability to move forward in an area that affects the security and stability of Afghanistan,'' said U.S. Gen. John Craddock. ''It will allow us to reduce the funding and income to the insurgents.''
U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who pressed for the anti-drug effort, welcomed the NATO deal.
He said the Unites States and the British are interested in attacking the drug problem, along with some others whom he did not name.
Since the bulk of the drug problems are in the southern part of the country, he said it is likely troops there will be more willing interdict drugs than those in other locations.
The split is not unusual, since some countries already limit the use of their troops in Afghanistan, based on what are called caveats. The restriction include how, where or when some troops will fight.
Germany and Spain agreed to the anti-drug mission after an appeal for help from Afghanistan's defense minister.
''We've asked NATO to please support us, support our effort in destroying the labs and also the interdiction of the drugs and the chemical precursors that are coming from outside the country for making heroin,'' Gen. Abdul Rahim Wardak told reporters after meeting his NATO counterparts Thursday.
Afghanistan supplies 90 percent of the world's heroin, a trade worth billions of dollars.
Until now, responsibility for dealing with the problem has lain with the Afghan police, but NATO commanders believe the fledgling force cannot cope with the problem. They say the time has come for NATO to move against the drug barons.
To start, at least, the operation will focus in the southern region of Afghanistan, where NATO officials say drug production is concentrated.
Some allies were concerned that a counter-narcotics campaign could spark a backlash against their troops, even if, as NATO commanders insist, the campaign will not target farmers who depend on growing opium poppies for a living.
They also feared that widening the mission could over-stretch the hard-pressed troops and undermine NATO's long-term goal of handing more responsibility to Afghan forces. However, German Defense Minister Franz Josef Jung said he was pleased with the compromise.
''We have to stop the financing of terrorism with drugs,'' he told reporters.
Associated Press writers Barbara Schaeder, Pablo Gorondi and Lolita C. Baldor contributed to this report.
BUDAPEST, HUNGARY: NATO defense ministers today authorized their troops in Afghanistan to attack drug barons blamed for pumping up to $100 million a year into the coffers of resurgent Taliban fighters.
''With regard to counter-narcotics . . . ISAF can act in concert with the Afghans against facilities and facilitators supporting the insurgency,'' said NATO spokesman James Appathurai, referring to the NATO force.
The United States has pushed for NATO's 50,000 troops to take on a counter-narcotics role to hit back at the Taliban, whose increasing attacks have cast doubt on the prospects of a Western military victory in Afghanistan.
However, Germany, Spain and others were wary and their doubts led to NATO imposing conditions on the anti-drug mandate for the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force.
Troops will only be able to act against drug facilities if authorized by their own governments; only drug producers deemed to be supporting the insurgency will be targeted; and the operation must be designed to be temporary — lasting only until the Afghan security forces are deemed able to take on the task.
NATO defense ministers will review the success of the mission when they meet next February in Poland. Despite the limitations, NATO's top commander said the agreement gave him sufficient authority to act against the Taliban's drug lord backers.
''We now have the ability to move forward in an area that affects the security and stability of Afghanistan,'' said U.S. Gen. John Craddock. ''It will allow us to reduce the funding and income to the insurgents.''
U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who pressed for the anti-drug effort, welcomed the NATO deal.
He said the Unites States and the British are interested in attacking the drug problem, along with some others whom he did not name.
Since the bulk of the drug problems are in the southern part of the country, he said it is likely troops there will be more willing interdict drugs than those in other locations.
The split is not unusual, since some countries already limit the use of their troops in Afghanistan, based on what are called caveats. The restriction include how, where or when some troops will fight.
Germany and Spain agreed to the anti-drug mission after an appeal for help from Afghanistan's defense minister.
''We've asked NATO to please support us, support our effort in destroying the labs and also the interdiction of the drugs and the chemical precursors that are coming from outside the country for making heroin,'' Gen. Abdul Rahim Wardak told reporters after meeting his NATO counterparts Thursday.
Afghanistan supplies 90 percent of the world's heroin, a trade worth billions of dollars.
Until now, responsibility for dealing with the problem has lain with the Afghan police, but NATO commanders believe the fledgling force cannot cope with the problem. They say the time has come for NATO to move against the drug barons.
To start, at least, the operation will focus in the southern region of Afghanistan, where NATO officials say drug production is concentrated.
Some allies were concerned that a counter-narcotics campaign could spark a backlash against their troops, even if, as NATO commanders insist, the campaign will not target farmers who depend on growing opium poppies for a living.
They also feared that widening the mission could over-stretch the hard-pressed troops and undermine NATO's long-term goal of handing more responsibility to Afghan forces. However, German Defense Minister Franz Josef Jung said he was pleased with the compromise.
''We have to stop the financing of terrorism with drugs,'' he told reporters.
Associated Press writers Barbara Schaeder, Pablo Gorondi and Lolita C. Baldor contributed to this report.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
AKRON, OH
Posted 03:17 PM, 10/10/2008
THIS HAS A FAMILIAR RING TO IT. TARGETING DRUG CARTELS - NOT ALL - JUST SELECTED ONES. AND JUST UNTIL THE AFGHANS CAN GET THEIR COLLECTIVE ACT TOGETHER. BUT - HEY - WAIT A MINUTE - AFGHANISTAN PRODUCES 90% OF THE WORLD'S HEROIN - SO THIS IS HARDLY A FLY-BY-NIGHT OPERATION. NOW - ALL OF A SUDDEN WE'RE GOING TO MOVE IN, TAKE OUT SELECTED TARGETS, AND CALL IT A DAY. HOPING, OF COURSE, THE TALABAN RUNS OUT OF OPERATING FUNDS AND STRUGGLES TO OPERATE. THE DRUG PROBLEM IN THE UNITED STATES IS MUCH, PERMIT ME TO REPEAT, MUCH, MORE SERIOUS DELIMMA. IF WE CAN'T SOLVE THIS PROBLEM FOR OURSELVES, WHO THE HECK ARE WE TO PRESUME TO HAVE THE EXPERTISE TO UNDERTAKE THIS FOR ANOTHER. TO STOP THE DRUGS, YOU HAVE TO KILL THE CROPS. IN ADDITION, YOU HAVE TO MAKE A STATEMENT OF INTLOERANCE FOR DRUGS. SUPPOSE, FOR EXAMPLE, SUMMARILY KILLING THOSE FOUND WITH DISTRIBUTION QUANTITIES OF DRUGS. USERS GET REHAB - ONCE - THEN TIME. YEAH SURE - LET'S FIX FRIGGEN' AFGHANISTAN.
