Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Blogs:
Pets:
Sunburn in canines and felines
The Heldenfiles:
Monday Notebook, New "90210" on DVD
Patrick McManamon:
Another NBA free agent goes to a Cavs competitor
Akron Zips:
Opponent outlook: Northern Illinois
Browns Bulletin:
Single-game ticket sales begin July 11
Tribe Matters:
Marte is IL’s Batter of the Week
Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth test showed marijuana
Kent State Sports:
Men's Basketball Scheduling update
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Free Agency Update: Frye in View?
All Da King's Men:
The Obligatory Palin Post
Blog of Mass Destruction:
The "Limbaugh Babies"
Akron Law Café:
The Veil and the Burqa – Constitutional to Ban or Restrict?
Varsity Letters:
Solon’s Baldwin could decide soon
See Jane Style:
Picnic Wear
Car Chase:
Where do We Go from Here?
Let's Talk Real Estate:
ID My Bug
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jennifer inquires about a bus tour to Atlantic City
Sound Check:
Rundgren fans rejoice!: Second night of AWATS at The Civic added
HRLite House:
DDI One of Best Places to Work
Akron Gamer:
Hot link: Best of Nintendo at E3
Buckeyes might have beaten Boilermakers, but offense played hit-and-miss game
By Sheldon Ocker
Beacon Journal sports writer
POSTED: 07:44 a.m. EDT, Oct 12, 2008
COLUMBUS: Ohio State's dreary 16-3 win over Purdue on Saturday was evocative of a bad spring practice game. But it was hard to tell what the Buckeyes were rehearsing, unless it was field-goal kicking.
The Boilermakers didn't figure to be a challenging opponent, and Ohio State never was in danger of losing. But that was hardly the point. This was the sort of game in which powerful teams run away and hide in the first half, so the head coach can replace his headset with an iPod in the third quarter and listen to Music of Your Life or John Phillip Sousa marches.
Not so the Buckeyes, whose only touchdown was scored by offensive stranger Etienne Sabino, a freshman backup linebacker, who picked up a punt blocked by Malcom Jenkins and ran 20 yards unimpeded to the end zone with 11:41 to play in the first quarter.
After that, Ohio State occupied its time with various failed drives — failed, if touchdowns were the objective — that brought home this salient point: Even a superb running back like Beanie Wells can be rendered ineffective unless the line blocks.
The Buckeyes netted only 125 yards on the ground, 98 by Wells, who averaged 4.3 per carry. Three times he broke loose for relatively long gains: 16 yards, 24 yards and 12 yards. But tellingly, he gained three or fewer yards on 12 of his 22 carries.
This is not a reflection on Wells' ability, desire or the fact that he missed a day of practice because he was sick. Simply stated, more than half of the time he touched the ball, he was surrounded by Purdue defenders.
For those fans inclined to blame coach Jim Tressel for his lack of creative play calling and his dependency on the run, keep in mind that the Boilermakers came in having given up an average of 196 yards per game. If that's not an invitation to run, I don't know what is.
On the other hand, Purdue is no dynamo defending the pass, averaging 239.8 yards per game. Of course, that was before Saturday.
Tressel readily admitted that his team spit the bit when it came to blocking, whether for Wells and his lodge brothers at running back or for quarterback Terrelle Pryor, when he dropped back to throw, which he did 17 times, including thrice when he was sacked.
Asked to describe the workmanship of the offense, Tressel said, ''Hit and miss. . . . We were not consistent at all.
''It will be interesting to watch the film, but from where I was, we certainly didn't control the line of scrimmage, and that's where it starts.''
The best thing Tressel could think of on behalf of his offense was this: ''We didn't get nearly as much done as we're going to need to get done, but we didn't turn it over.''
High praise, indeed. At least, the Buckeyes made 3-of-4 field-goal attempts.
Things to consider
So how about mitigating circumstances?
There were a couple of things.
The Buckeyes still might have been rubbing their bruises from the physical win over Wisconsin a week earlier. Moreover, no matter what kind of psyche job Tressel might have mustered, his troops were not going to believe Purdue would offer enough resistance to merit their full attention. If the running game wasn't working, why didn't Tressel loosen the leash on Pryor and let him throw more?
After all, Purdue's defense is equally shoddy when it comes to stopping the pass as the run. Tressel is nothing if not cautious. Pryor is a supremely talented player who can win games with his legs and his arm, but he needs much more work on his judgment to earn the coach's trust. As he did against the Badgers, Pryor often held the ball too long, thinking he could elude an entire defense and make a play.
I'm sure he did that in high school, but the Big Ten, even in its current lowly state (take note of Toledo's win over Michigan), is hardly high school. Yes, the kid will learn, but if Tressel can help it, his education won't come at the expense of losing games. The problem is this: The Buckeyes might lose anyway. I might have missed a rule change or two, but as far as I know Tressel cannot trade for an offensive lineman or sign one as a free agent. He is stuck playing the hand he has. For the time being, Tressel would be better off allowing Pryor to throw more downfield passes, that is, 20 yarders not 40 yarders, which might loosen things up for Wells. That might be a risk the coach prefers not to take, but it also might be the lesser of two evils.
Sheldon Ocker can be reached at socker@thebeaconjournal.com.
COLUMBUS: Ohio State's dreary 16-3 win over Purdue on Saturday was evocative of a bad spring practice game. But it was hard to tell what the Buckeyes were rehearsing, unless it was field-goal kicking.
The Boilermakers didn't figure to be a challenging opponent, and Ohio State never was in danger of losing. But that was hardly the point. This was the sort of game in which powerful teams run away and hide in the first half, so the head coach can replace his headset with an iPod in the third quarter and listen to Music of Your Life or John Phillip Sousa marches.
Not so the Buckeyes, whose only touchdown was scored by offensive stranger Etienne Sabino, a freshman backup linebacker, who picked up a punt blocked by Malcom Jenkins and ran 20 yards unimpeded to the end zone with 11:41 to play in the first quarter.
After that, Ohio State occupied its time with various failed drives — failed, if touchdowns were the objective — that brought home this salient point: Even a superb running back like Beanie Wells can be rendered ineffective unless the line blocks.
The Buckeyes netted only 125 yards on the ground, 98 by Wells, who averaged 4.3 per carry. Three times he broke loose for relatively long gains: 16 yards, 24 yards and 12 yards. But tellingly, he gained three or fewer yards on 12 of his 22 carries.
This is not a reflection on Wells' ability, desire or the fact that he missed a day of practice because he was sick. Simply stated, more than half of the time he touched the ball, he was surrounded by Purdue defenders.
For those fans inclined to blame coach Jim Tressel for his lack of creative play calling and his dependency on the run, keep in mind that the Boilermakers came in having given up an average of 196 yards per game. If that's not an invitation to run, I don't know what is.
On the other hand, Purdue is no dynamo defending the pass, averaging 239.8 yards per game. Of course, that was before Saturday.
Tressel readily admitted that his team spit the bit when it came to blocking, whether for Wells and his lodge brothers at running back or for quarterback Terrelle Pryor, when he dropped back to throw, which he did 17 times, including thrice when he was sacked.
Asked to describe the workmanship of the offense, Tressel said, ''Hit and miss. . . . We were not consistent at all.
''It will be interesting to watch the film, but from where I was, we certainly didn't control the line of scrimmage, and that's where it starts.''
The best thing Tressel could think of on behalf of his offense was this: ''We didn't get nearly as much done as we're going to need to get done, but we didn't turn it over.''
High praise, indeed. At least, the Buckeyes made 3-of-4 field-goal attempts.
Things to consider
So how about mitigating circumstances?
There were a couple of things.
The Buckeyes still might have been rubbing their bruises from the physical win over Wisconsin a week earlier. Moreover, no matter what kind of psyche job Tressel might have mustered, his troops were not going to believe Purdue would offer enough resistance to merit their full attention. If the running game wasn't working, why didn't Tressel loosen the leash on Pryor and let him throw more?
After all, Purdue's defense is equally shoddy when it comes to stopping the pass as the run. Tressel is nothing if not cautious. Pryor is a supremely talented player who can win games with his legs and his arm, but he needs much more work on his judgment to earn the coach's trust. As he did against the Badgers, Pryor often held the ball too long, thinking he could elude an entire defense and make a play.
I'm sure he did that in high school, but the Big Ten, even in its current lowly state (take note of Toledo's win over Michigan), is hardly high school. Yes, the kid will learn, but if Tressel can help it, his education won't come at the expense of losing games. The problem is this: The Buckeyes might lose anyway. I might have missed a rule change or two, but as far as I know Tressel cannot trade for an offensive lineman or sign one as a free agent. He is stuck playing the hand he has. For the time being, Tressel would be better off allowing Pryor to throw more downfield passes, that is, 20 yarders not 40 yarders, which might loosen things up for Wells. That might be a risk the coach prefers not to take, but it also might be the lesser of two evils.
Sheldon Ocker can be reached at socker@thebeaconjournal.com.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
Posted 08:35 AM, 10/12/2008
This is just NOT one of those win 'em all look like a National Champion Team years - the Buckeyes are transitioning from Big Ten run and muscle to a more mid country dare we say west coast stlye of play
San Diego, CA
Posted 11:09 AM, 10/12/2008
Before the season started, my thoughts were that the Buckeyes would go as far as their offensive and defensive lines would take them. Neither seems up to the task. What baffles me is some of the changes in personnel. I saw Steve Rehring playing right tackle for a short while yesterday (until he gave up two consecutive sacks) and he doesn't have the feet to play the position. I'm sure the coaches knew that. I would guess that was why he was playing guard to begin with. Then why play him there.
And I have to be honest...I'm a little disappointed in Terrelle Pryor. He's supposed to have 4.4 speed. I think he needs to have someone tell him to start running harder. I don't think he runs as hard and fast as he can. Hopefully, the Buckeyes won't lose many more but it will be surprising if they play the remaining games without another loss.
