Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Family found dead in Ohio home
Man gets 3 years in prison for having sex with horse
Robbers order bar patrons to empty pockets
Sex-toy study at Duke University raises some eyebrows
Akron man turns himself in after authorities turn up heat
Man appears alive at own funeral
Take comfort in knowing Browns could be bigger losers
Blogs:
Pets:
Not 101 Dalmations…but close!
The Heldenfiles:
Friday Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
For your perusal
Akron Zips:
No. 1 UA soccer remains perfect, Zips football defeats rival Flashes
Tribe Matters:
Tribe makes roster moves
Cleveland Browns:
Lewis doesn't like boycott
Kent State Sports:
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs at Knicks
Buckeye Blogging:
Weekly ‘B’ Deck Report – New Mexico St.
Varsity Letters:
Wrestling, bowling teams prepare for season
All Da King's Men:
If It Looks Like Islamic Terrorism…
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Dems Message To Women: Don't Enjoy The Sex
Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (62) The Stupak Amendment
See Jane Style:
Muffle Your Muffler
Car Chase:
Perfect Weather for an Autumn Drive
Let's Talk Real Estate:
RUMORS: Downtown Restaurant Explosion
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jack is looking for a trip to Southern Ohio the week of November 16.
Sound Check:
The Black Keys to perform benefit concert at Musica on November 27
HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why People Do Not Live in Northeast Ohio
Akron Gamer:
New 'Call of Duty' could set entertainment record
Buckeyes might have beaten Boilermakers, but offense played hit-and-miss game
By Sheldon Ocker
Beacon Journal sports writer
POSTED: 07:44 a.m. EDT, Oct 12, 2008
COLUMBUS: Ohio State's dreary 16-3 win over Purdue on Saturday was evocative of a bad spring practice game. But it was hard to tell what the Buckeyes were rehearsing, unless it was field-goal kicking.
The Boilermakers didn't figure to be a challenging opponent, and Ohio State never was in danger of losing. But that was hardly the point. This was the sort of game in which powerful teams run away and hide in the first half, so the head coach can replace his headset with an iPod in the third quarter and listen to Music of Your Life or John Phillip Sousa marches.
Not so the Buckeyes, whose only touchdown was scored by offensive stranger Etienne Sabino, a freshman backup linebacker, who picked up a punt blocked by Malcom Jenkins and ran 20 yards unimpeded to the end zone with 11:41 to play in the first quarter.
After that, Ohio State occupied its time with various failed drives — failed, if touchdowns were the objective — that brought home this salient point: Even a superb running back like Beanie Wells can be rendered ineffective unless the line blocks.
The Buckeyes netted only 125 yards on the ground, 98 by Wells, who averaged 4.3 per carry. Three times he broke loose for relatively long gains: 16 yards, 24 yards and 12 yards. But tellingly, he gained three or fewer yards on 12 of his 22 carries.
This is not a reflection on Wells' ability, desire or the fact that he missed a day of practice because he was sick. Simply stated, more than half of the time he touched the ball, he was surrounded by Purdue defenders.
For those fans inclined to blame coach Jim Tressel for his lack of creative play calling and his dependency on the run, keep in mind that the Boilermakers came in having given up an average of 196 yards per game. If that's not an invitation to run, I don't know what is.
On the other hand, Purdue is no dynamo defending the pass, averaging 239.8 yards per game. Of course, that was before Saturday.
Tressel readily admitted that his team spit the bit when it came to blocking, whether for Wells and his lodge brothers at running back or for quarterback Terrelle Pryor, when he dropped back to throw, which he did 17 times, including thrice when he was sacked.
Asked to describe the workmanship of the offense, Tressel said, ''Hit and miss. . . . We were not consistent at all.
''It will be interesting to watch the film, but from where I was, we certainly didn't control the line of scrimmage, and that's where it starts.''
The best thing Tressel could think of on behalf of his offense was this: ''We didn't get nearly as much done as we're going to need to get done, but we didn't turn it over.''
High praise, indeed. At least, the Buckeyes made 3-of-4 field-goal attempts.
Things to consider
So how about mitigating circumstances?
There were a couple of things.
The Buckeyes still might have been rubbing their bruises from the physical win over Wisconsin a week earlier. Moreover, no matter what kind of psyche job Tressel might have mustered, his troops were not going to believe Purdue would offer enough resistance to merit their full attention. If the running game wasn't working, why didn't Tressel loosen the leash on Pryor and let him throw more?
After all, Purdue's defense is equally shoddy when it comes to stopping the pass as the run. Tressel is nothing if not cautious. Pryor is a supremely talented player who can win games with his legs and his arm, but he needs much more work on his judgment to earn the coach's trust. As he did against the Badgers, Pryor often held the ball too long, thinking he could elude an entire defense and make a play.
I'm sure he did that in high school, but the Big Ten, even in its current lowly state (take note of Toledo's win over Michigan), is hardly high school. Yes, the kid will learn, but if Tressel can help it, his education won't come at the expense of losing games. The problem is this: The Buckeyes might lose anyway. I might have missed a rule change or two, but as far as I know Tressel cannot trade for an offensive lineman or sign one as a free agent. He is stuck playing the hand he has. For the time being, Tressel would be better off allowing Pryor to throw more downfield passes, that is, 20 yarders not 40 yarders, which might loosen things up for Wells. That might be a risk the coach prefers not to take, but it also might be the lesser of two evils.
Sheldon Ocker can be reached at socker@thebeaconjournal.com.
COLUMBUS: Ohio State's dreary 16-3 win over Purdue on Saturday was evocative of a bad spring practice game. But it was hard to tell what the Buckeyes were rehearsing, unless it was field-goal kicking.
The Boilermakers didn't figure to be a challenging opponent, and Ohio State never was in danger of losing. But that was hardly the point. This was the sort of game in which powerful teams run away and hide in the first half, so the head coach can replace his headset with an iPod in the third quarter and listen to Music of Your Life or John Phillip Sousa marches.
Not so the Buckeyes, whose only touchdown was scored by offensive stranger Etienne Sabino, a freshman backup linebacker, who picked up a punt blocked by Malcom Jenkins and ran 20 yards unimpeded to the end zone with 11:41 to play in the first quarter.
After that, Ohio State occupied its time with various failed drives — failed, if touchdowns were the objective — that brought home this salient point: Even a superb running back like Beanie Wells can be rendered ineffective unless the line blocks.
The Buckeyes netted only 125 yards on the ground, 98 by Wells, who averaged 4.3 per carry. Three times he broke loose for relatively long gains: 16 yards, 24 yards and 12 yards. But tellingly, he gained three or fewer yards on 12 of his 22 carries.
This is not a reflection on Wells' ability, desire or the fact that he missed a day of practice because he was sick. Simply stated, more than half of the time he touched the ball, he was surrounded by Purdue defenders.
For those fans inclined to blame coach Jim Tressel for his lack of creative play calling and his dependency on the run, keep in mind that the Boilermakers came in having given up an average of 196 yards per game. If that's not an invitation to run, I don't know what is.
On the other hand, Purdue is no dynamo defending the pass, averaging 239.8 yards per game. Of course, that was before Saturday.
Tressel readily admitted that his team spit the bit when it came to blocking, whether for Wells and his lodge brothers at running back or for quarterback Terrelle Pryor, when he dropped back to throw, which he did 17 times, including thrice when he was sacked.
Asked to describe the workmanship of the offense, Tressel said, ''Hit and miss. . . . We were not consistent at all.
''It will be interesting to watch the film, but from where I was, we certainly didn't control the line of scrimmage, and that's where it starts.''
The best thing Tressel could think of on behalf of his offense was this: ''We didn't get nearly as much done as we're going to need to get done, but we didn't turn it over.''
High praise, indeed. At least, the Buckeyes made 3-of-4 field-goal attempts.
Things to consider
So how about mitigating circumstances?
There were a couple of things.
The Buckeyes still might have been rubbing their bruises from the physical win over Wisconsin a week earlier. Moreover, no matter what kind of psyche job Tressel might have mustered, his troops were not going to believe Purdue would offer enough resistance to merit their full attention. If the running game wasn't working, why didn't Tressel loosen the leash on Pryor and let him throw more?
After all, Purdue's defense is equally shoddy when it comes to stopping the pass as the run. Tressel is nothing if not cautious. Pryor is a supremely talented player who can win games with his legs and his arm, but he needs much more work on his judgment to earn the coach's trust. As he did against the Badgers, Pryor often held the ball too long, thinking he could elude an entire defense and make a play.
I'm sure he did that in high school, but the Big Ten, even in its current lowly state (take note of Toledo's win over Michigan), is hardly high school. Yes, the kid will learn, but if Tressel can help it, his education won't come at the expense of losing games. The problem is this: The Buckeyes might lose anyway. I might have missed a rule change or two, but as far as I know Tressel cannot trade for an offensive lineman or sign one as a free agent. He is stuck playing the hand he has. For the time being, Tressel would be better off allowing Pryor to throw more downfield passes, that is, 20 yarders not 40 yarders, which might loosen things up for Wells. That might be a risk the coach prefers not to take, but it also might be the lesser of two evils.
Sheldon Ocker can be reached at socker@thebeaconjournal.com.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
Posted 08:35 AM, 10/12/2008
This is just NOT one of those win 'em all look like a National Champion Team years - the Buckeyes are transitioning from Big Ten run and muscle to a more mid country dare we say west coast stlye of play
San Diego, CA
Posted 11:09 AM, 10/12/2008
Before the season started, my thoughts were that the Buckeyes would go as far as their offensive and defensive lines would take them. Neither seems up to the task. What baffles me is some of the changes in personnel. I saw Steve Rehring playing right tackle for a short while yesterday (until he gave up two consecutive sacks) and he doesn't have the feet to play the position. I'm sure the coaches knew that. I would guess that was why he was playing guard to begin with. Then why play him there.
And I have to be honest...I'm a little disappointed in Terrelle Pryor. He's supposed to have 4.4 speed. I think he needs to have someone tell him to start running harder. I don't think he runs as hard and fast as he can. Hopefully, the Buckeyes won't lose many more but it will be surprising if they play the remaining games without another loss.
